Hi.
Interesting. I called SV to talk to them more about positive vs balanced. After some faffing around with someone who was not much better than the guy who came out, they put me through to a guy who apparently is the design engineer, who compiles the stats for the councils and a bunch of other stuff that led me to believe he knew what he was talking about. He understood my concerns but was adamant the positive system would be the worthwhile solution for us. His reasoning (not word for word):
1) New houses are ones built on the 2012 spec for insultation and other revised standards. There have been subsequent updates in 2014 and 2016 which are even more stringent. Those houses are airtight.
2) 2006 is a newish home, but still very leaky, unless they are designed well well overspec.
3) 2006 home will leak air and make a full HRV system not as effective as they are designed to be.
4) In an balanced system in our house config, the ducting runs are very long. There is a lot of pressure lost.
5) I am unsure if I got this exactly right, but air changes more frequently in the positive pressure system.
Neither will cool my daughters room or wifes office which are side by side, very much, but the summer kit in the positive pressure system is going to reduce temps slightly, he estimates 2-5 degrees, but it isn't possible to know easily in advance of installation.
He thought 8K for the balanced system was likely due to huge insultated ducting requirement and thought it was likely to cost slightly less with SV but not much less.
Thoughts?



