I question the economics of doing any major work on older vehicles. I had a really good 1996 diesel people-mover and had maintenance done on it regularly. Blew the motor on it through a mechanic charging for work that was never done. With this model of vehicle its a rule of thumb to replace the cam belt every four years max. Cam broke, cracked the head, destroyed the turbo diesel. Reconditioned second-hand motor went into it, except it wasn't reconditioned. More money went into repairing the sump. Eventually, after a trip to the auto electricians I drove straight into Turners and left with a cash cheque for $2,000.
I actually spent more in repairs than I did on the purchase price.
It's all very well getting loads of work done on an old car (and probably is wiser than buying another old car - better the devil you know and all that) but it's very hard for the non-mechanical amongst us to know if the work is (a)necessary and (b) being done properly. I'm not throwing good money after bad on older cars any more, instead I will run an oldie with regular maintenance and at the first sign of a big bill will flip it off.




