Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
MikeAqua
8024 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3817


  #2001368 24-Apr-2018 08:19
Send private message

Aredwood:

 

Banning oil exploration doesn't and wont reduce direct emissions. As more oil will simply be pumped out of existing overseas oil fields to offset the oil that would have otherwise come from NZ.

 

 

Agreed.  NZ's fossil fuel use won't reduce as result of reducing exploration in NZ.  When we eventually start producing less oil and gas, we will simply import more.  Same consumption. Increased trade deficit.  No change in global emissions - unless they increase because more difficult fields have to be exploited.

 

We need better technology to reduce the need for fossil fuels.  Mostly we need better, cheaper batteries and solar panels.





Mike




Jase2985
13730 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6202

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2001386 24-Apr-2018 09:16
Send private message

importing more gas = higher emissions as instead of piping it places it now comes on ships which burn what?


MikeAqua
8024 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3817


  #2001392 24-Apr-2018 09:23
Send private message

Jase2985:

 

importing more gas = higher emissions as instead of piping it places it now comes on ships which burn what?

 

 

HFO = heavy fuel oil.  Bigger molecules, looks like hot tar, burns dirty.





Mike


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.