itxtme:
There are thousands of examples of businesses that rely on forward bookings for cash flow. The question is why are some airlines needing bail outs immediately and others not? I suggest we are looking at an airline that has not prepared for a rainy day, granted nobody foresaw how rainy it was going to get. I havent seen the latest financials for them but 2018/19 saw 150+% of free cash dividends paid out, plus share buy backs. The likes of Qantas have generated a decent war chest comparably and apparently don't need an immediate bail out, so have some behaved a little more recklessly?
Equally what is your comment to those who have lost jobs or income and want their money back for a service they did not receive? They are entitled to it, so whats is your argument for misleading behaviour by the airline?
Air NZ have a $900m loan facility with the government and have not drawn this down at this point. The fact Air NZ had $1 billion in cash puts them in a relatively strong place for their size - Qantas had $1.9 billion in cash but immediately had to take out a $1.05 billion loan which they drew down in late March. Qantas have stood down 2/3 of their staff and a number of these are on unpaid leave with estimates that cash will last them somewhere between 7-11 months.
Air NZ did not pay down a dividend, that was cancelled as part of the loan facility deal.
I think you're somehow confused and think I'm defending the airlines - I'm not. I'm merely pointing out the facts, and the fact that it's not just Air NZ who are trying their best not to pay out refunds. If you'd read anything I've written across multiple platforms you'd know I've been highly critical of Air NZ's approach and already helped a number of people with their refunds.



