Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
DravidDavid
1907 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 305


  #1274297 31-Mar-2015 13:08
Send private message

I am waiting on that flight data recorder being found in order to rule out mechanical failure before jumping to conclusions about the pilot.



frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1274379 31-Mar-2015 13:55
Send private message

Geektastic:
DarthKermit: In retrospect, it would have been a lot better if another person had been inside with the suicidal pilot. He/she might have been able to save the situation. A much higher chance of a successful outcome than what actually occurred.

In retrospect, it would have been a lot better if that pilot had done the world a favour and jumped off a tall building, only taking his life and not 149 innocent people.


In retrospect it would have been better if he had sought help, had treatment and returned to a normal life...!


I think of particular interest is how the system that is supposed to prevent this situation precipitated it...

A pilot is not allowed to fly whilst on anti-depressants (except in Australia, I think). Admitting to depression to his employer effectively means an end to his airline career (his dream job), and an end to his earning (with very likely a huge amount of debt). So it would be very tempting to hide treatment for depression, and/or to stop any treatment early. Add to this his potentially career-ending eyesight issues, a newly pregnant girlfriend who is leaving him, and you can see that he is in an overwhelming amount of psychological difficulty, and doesn't have the resources to cope with it.

Under the circumstances, I don't think the outcome is surprising.


shk292
2916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2040

Lifetime subscriber

  #1274404 31-Mar-2015 14:07
Send private message

How about this as a suggested change to the door lock system - two switches in the cockpit, at opposite sides (ie not reachable by the same person).  Both need to be pressed within 0.5s of each other to activate the lockout function.



DravidDavid
1907 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 305


  #1274434 31-Mar-2015 14:29
Send private message

shk292: How about this as a suggested change to the door lock system - two switches in the cockpit, at opposite sides (ie not reachable by the same person).  Both need to be pressed within 0.5s of each other to activate the lockout function.


Or an over-ride key pad that can't be disabled.

shk292
2916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2040

Lifetime subscriber

  #1274443 31-Mar-2015 14:32
Send private message

DravidDavid:
shk292: How about this as a suggested change to the door lock system - two switches in the cockpit, at opposite sides (ie not reachable by the same person).  Both need to be pressed within 0.5s of each other to activate the lockout function.


Or an over-ride key pad that can't be disabled.


But, the problem with that is the 'terrorist with a gun to the head of a kid' scenario where a crew member outside the flight deck is persuaded to open the door.  If you want to make that impossible, you need a system which cannot be overridden from outside.  But based on this incident, it mustn't be operable by a single person

DravidDavid
1907 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 305


  #1274469 31-Mar-2015 14:44
Send private message

shk292:
DravidDavid:
shk292: How about this as a suggested change to the door lock system - two switches in the cockpit, at opposite sides (ie not reachable by the same person).  Both need to be pressed within 0.5s of each other to activate the lockout function.


Or an over-ride key pad that can't be disabled.


But, the problem with that is the 'terrorist with a gun to the head of a kid' scenario where a crew member outside the flight deck is persuaded to open the door.  If you want to make that impossible, you need a system which cannot be overridden from outside.  But based on this incident, it mustn't be operable by a single person


There is no getting around the gun to the kid's head situation.  If someone wants to get in and are willing to go to extreme lengths such as that, they will always get in if the pilot is willing to let them in.

 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
Dingbatt
6804 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3694

Lifetime subscriber

  #1274538 31-Mar-2015 15:50
Send private message

All of this is a bit like selecting 'lock override' after the horse had bolted. Like a lot of things in life you can't predict and protect from a really determined nutter. They will just find a different way.
The airline pilots that I know just want to get home to their families each night. Therefore the simple act of having a stewardess go into the cockpit if one of the pilots needs to pop out for a pee would be sufficient. No need for even more complicated systems than those already in use because you know who will pay for any hardware modifications don't you?




“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996


frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1274573 31-Mar-2015 16:03
Send private message

Dingbatt: No need for even more complicated systems than those already in use because you know who will pay for any hardware modifications don't you?


And you know that, since it's aviation, it will cost an absolute fortune, and will take *years* to design and implement.


hairy1
3352 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 644

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1274595 31-Mar-2015 16:50
Send private message

The reason Aviation is so safe is because every incident is recorded and analysed. Hence the problem with Malaysia 370 (there is no aircraft to analyse) There will be a mitigation to this. The mitigation solution for MH370 disappearing is already in process.

Increased medical surveillance is probably on the cards. One "rogue" probably now means more bureaucracy.




My views (except when I am looking out their windows) are not those of my employer.


Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1274620 31-Mar-2015 16:57
Send private message

I have a feeling Malaysia 370 and this tragedy has a similar circumstance ..

Geektastic
18010 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8470

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1274912 1-Apr-2015 08:28
Send private message

Perhaps it's time for civilian pilots to wear fighter Pilot style Flight suits with internal catheter bags so that no one need leave the cockpit....





HP

 
 
 
 

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

Stu

Stu
Hammered
8744 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2409

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1274915 1-Apr-2015 08:40
Send private message

That might not be enough for long haul flights. Ensuite in the cockpit, perhaps? ;-)




People often mistake me for an adult because of my age.

 

Keep calm, and carry on posting.

 

Referral Links: Sharesies

 

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? If so, please consider supporting us by subscribing.

 

No matter where you go, there you are.


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1274935 1-Apr-2015 09:10
Send private message

Geektastic: Perhaps it's time for civilian pilots to wear fighter Pilot style Flight suits with internal catheter bags so that no one need leave the cockpit....


Or make pilots only drink decaf coffee so they don't have problem with caffeine induced diuresis!

Every time you walk past Fuel at Wellington airport there are always multiple pilots getting their fix, and it's very rare for a flight without the crew taking in coffee. It makes we wonder if they could cope flying a plane if they weren't wired! smile


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1274938 1-Apr-2015 09:12
Send private message

Stu: That might not be enough for long haul flights. Ensuite in the cockpit, perhaps? ;-)


This is the case with the 747 which has a bathroom for the crew in their secure area. I'm pretty sure the A380 has this as well.


frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1275714 1-Apr-2015 20:58
Send private message

sbiddle:
Geektastic: Perhaps it's time for civilian pilots to wear fighter Pilot style Flight suits with internal catheter bags so that no one need leave the cockpit....


Or make pilots only drink decaf coffee so they don't have problem with caffeine induced diuresis!



And have the pilots go to sleep???? What are you thinking???


1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.