Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ... | 182
GV27
5977 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #2106980 12-Oct-2018 19:22
Send private message

I'm sorry, but given the campaign of misinformation in the Herald about HR vs LRT this week, I can't let posts like this slide. 

 

Aredwood: 

 

The existing heavy rail network can be extended from Otahuhu through to Mangere. And from Kingsland to the North Western Motorway and through to Westgate Measure the distance between the northern line and the NW motorway in Kingsland near the Bond St overbridge. So rail service can be provided to outer areas that are proposed to be covered by the tram network, without needing to build another inner city network first.

 

 

Wow. This is a pretty outlandish claim. I've never seen any report modeling a HR connection rolled along the entire NW motorway, mostly because it would take up a huge amount of area and there's no heavy industry or depots to take advantage of it.

 

But let's entertain it. Let's say it 'can' be done. Let's say that we're going to dig a whole heap of tunnels (remembering heavy rail can't do gradient or turns like LRT can) and bridges to get heavy rail...kinda near SH16. Let's also be generous and say, based on the costings for the Airport Spur, that this will be roughly twice as expensive as LRT. I could sit here and work out the cost per km based on the CRL tunnels and figure out how close you'd end up getting to the Western Line that's already there. But as I can't find a report modeling it, I'm going to assume it hasn't been modeled because no one thinks it's worth doing - given that LRT and BRT have already had business cases, I'm guessing that's a safe assumption.

 

And no, the HR can't be extended to Mangere; in fact, Mangere totally misses out; unless you're planning a whole heap of tunneling just to put in a specific deviation (which the 2x cost of LRT doesn't include).  

 

But hey, engineering is just drawings lines on maps right? Totally tells the whole story. 

 

Aredwood: 

 

Existing heavy rail capacity into the CBD is constrained due to Britomart not being a through station. Which the CRL will fix. This will enable rail to replace some buses that serve areas that can be covered by more / new heavy rail. So less buses in the city.

 

 

You're assuming these buses are services that can be replaced by trains. Places where there are no trains generally can't offer trains as a substitute for buses. 

Aredwood: 

 

When the CRL opens, some of the Dominion rd buses would be able to stop in MT Eden, and transfer their passengers to CRL trains. Again less buses in the CBD.

 

...and again, raising a capacity constraint in the CRL. The CRL is rated for 48tph and will be close to capacity when it opens. We can't just fire an infinite number of trains down it.

 

Aredwood: 

 

And if rail is still needed down Dominion rd. A new branch line could be construed from the existing rail line in Mt Eden, and run down Dominion rd. Either way, heavy rail service can be provided to every place you mention, without needing to duplicate the CRL.

 

 

OK. Cool. Show me a business case. Show me the costs of HR with the same catchment. Show me the designation that will fit a HR train down Dominion Road. Show me how you're going to do that with heavy track and sleepers. I take it you have a business case to back this assertion up. 

 

Aredwood: 
As for traffic in rural areas. Look at SH 16 between Westgate and Kumeu. Northern Motorway between Albany and Silverdale. Southern Motorway between Manurewa and the Bombay Hills. Those areas are mostly rural, yet the above roads carry lots of commuter traffic. So those commuters are therefore driving through rural areas. If that land was rezoned to urban, then people who work in the City, won't have to live so far away. Why was Millwater rezoned to urban, while Stillwater left as rural? Kumeu rezoned while Westgate left rural?

 

Between Westgate and Kumeu? There's about six thousand houses going in there in the next ten years. 

I mean... here's the Universal Homes development - this is just Universal Homes mind you:

 

https://westhills.co.nz/availability-map

 

Here's the 'Malbec Estate' plan:

 

https://www.malbecliving.co.nz/

 

Here's the planning document out to 2032 for Westgate:

 

https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/auckland-plan/development-strategy/Documents/ds-westgate-node.pdf

 

Sorry, but there is so much easily challenged misinformation floating around by people with literally no skin in the game who think things should be done a certain way because they've decided something they like is better.

 

As someone who lives in Westgate/Massey, I've taken an active interest in the area and the issues it faces. It's pretty insulting to have people just dismiss the legitimate needs of an area that is hugely under-developed because they have their own personal axe to grind. 

 

 




Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #2106981 12-Oct-2018 19:27
Send private message

I'm very pleased - given that I'm a medium-term global economy pessimist right now - that the government maintains a healthy surplus.

 

That's thanks to reasonably prudent financial management by Key/English, a continuation of that since, and in defiance of Joyce's "fiscal hole" claim.

 

I really don't care much if Ardern goofed. 


Aredwood
3885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1749


  #2106996 12-Oct-2018 20:11

bmt:


I get the feeling all your wild plans and theories are pretty back of the envelope stuff. Heavy rail is not the answer. Read these:


https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2018/10/10/airport-connections-consider-the-whole-network/\


https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2018/10/12/over-estimating-the-importance-of-city-airport-trips/



@bmt The links you have posted compare trams to a heavy rail link from the airport to Puhunui. Which is completely different to what I was proposing - which is extending the existing heavy rail line at Onehunga, through Mangere, and to the airport.

As for an airport link not being needed. If so, just build the heavy rail line between Onehunga and Mangere. And omit the airport bit.

I cannot find any comparison between what I have proposed and trams. Why was a far longer heavy rail route used as a comparison option? Instead of a more direct route? This smells of politicians twisting things to get the outcome that they want.







GV27
5977 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #2107000 12-Oct-2018 20:26
Send private message

Aredwood:

 

@bmt The links you have posted compare trams to a heavy rail link from the airport to Puhunui. Which is completely different to what I was proposing - which is extending the existing heavy rail line at Onehunga, through Mangere, and to the airport.

As for an airport link not being needed. If so, just build the heavy rail line between Onehunga and Mangere. And omit the airport bit.

I cannot find any comparison between what I have proposed and trams. Why was a far longer heavy rail route used as a comparison option? Instead of a more direct route? This smells of politicians twisting things to get the outcome that they want.

 

https://at.govt.nz/media/1927306/draft-smart-indicative-business-case-appendix-b.pdf

 

It's one of the AT case studies.

 

Option development
Heavy rail, light rail and bus rapid transit options were developed to address the identified key problems and this
Indicative Business Case summarises all technically preferred options to date. Long list options were refined to
a shortlist which includes the following options:
Heavy rail – double tracking the Onehunga Branch Line from Penrose to Onehunga and extending the
line across the Manukau Harbour to the Airport via SH20 and SH20A;
 Light rail – extending the light rail alignment for Dominion Road along SH20 and SH20A to the Airport
via an interchange at Onehunga;
 Bus rapid transit – high frequency buses running on a busway along SH20/20A to Onehunga
interchange and bus lanes along Manukau Road, Khyber Pass Road and Symonds Street to a tunnel
on Wellesley Street in the city centre; and
 Hybrid option - high frequency buses running on a busway along SH20/20A to Onehunga interchange
followed by a heavy rail connection to Penrose via an upgraded Onehunga Branch Line. The hybrid
option was developed as a low cost alternative to implementing a busway along Manukau Road

 

I find the best cover-ups usually don't involve making things easily findable using Google, or including them in publically available case studies. 


MikeAqua
8031 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3820


  #2107991 15-Oct-2018 10:30
Send private message

The airport connection ... 

 

Long story short when I have to visit Auckland, time matters more than money, to a certain point.  If a light rail trip to the city took longer than a taxi (much shorter trips since the SH20 tunnel opened), I would ignore the price difference and take the taxi. 

 

I'm not sure how many people are in the same category, but on weekday a morning trip through Auckland Aiport, there are lots of business travellers getting into taxis.





Mike


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #2108006 15-Oct-2018 10:48
Send private message

What would the time different likely be? At the moment there isn't really a good alternative to taxis. I imagine a lot of people currently using them would switch to light rail if it became available. How much is traffic congestion likely to increase by the time it becomes available? 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
Reciprocity
169 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 97
Inactive user


  #2108020 15-Oct-2018 11:12
Send private message

How would traffic congestion not also effect a tram travelling the length of Dominion Rd?

MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2108023 15-Oct-2018 11:15
Send private message

Reciprocity: How would traffic congestion not also effect a tram travelling the length of Dominion Rd?

 

Light rail travels on a track not the road ?





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #2108043 15-Oct-2018 11:39
Send private message

And also, anywhere else in the world it has absolute right-of way anywhere the rails intersect with the road.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2108060 15-Oct-2018 11:50
Send private message

The decision years ago to get rid of the trams in Auckland and Wellington was a huge mistake. We should be looking at returning them to all our main cities and major suburbs. Example,  Light rail could aleviate a lot of Wellington Hutt Valley congestion and remove the need to increase capacity on the urban motorway . Over the years it has been shown that increasing motor vehicle capacity only increases motor vehicle capacity demands and does not reduce congestion in the long term.





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


6FIEND
774 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 589
Inactive user


  #2108705 16-Oct-2018 10:51
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Reciprocity: How would traffic congestion not also effect a tram travelling the length of Dominion Rd?

 

Light rail travels on a track not the road ?

 

 

I don't believe that's the plan for Dominion Rd.

 

 

Source: RNZ

 

 

 

Rikkitic:

 

And also, anywhere else in the world it has absolute right-of way anywhere the rails intersect with the road.

 

 

 

 

Absolute right of way won't mean diddly-squat when the road looks like this.

 

 

(and that's an old pic!)


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2108723 16-Oct-2018 11:11
Send private message

I was not aware that this is what they were intending,  that is not a smart plan, they should be atleast be travelling down the centre with designated passing points which should be able to be controlled. The plan proposed above will reslt and a spectacular Dominion car park for both road and track 





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #2108741 16-Oct-2018 11:31
Send private message

Lots of traffic congestion in Europe but the trams work well there. 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


networkn
Networkn
32871 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15468

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2108800 16-Oct-2018 12:23
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Lots of traffic congestion in Europe but the trams work well there. 

 

 

 

 

Better planned and executed than this Government is proposing I'll wager?

 

 


6FIEND
774 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 589
Inactive user


  #2108804 16-Oct-2018 12:29
Send private message

networkn:

 

Rikkitic:

 

Lots of traffic congestion in Europe but the trams work well there. 

 

 

 

 

Better planned and executed than this Government is proposing I'll wager?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also not situated on an Isthmus which significantly reduces the efficiency that can be achieved by running multiple. overlapping rail loops.


1 | ... | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ... | 182
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.