![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
browsing looks like mostly LG/Samsung models are around here in NZ
a friend bought an f8500 51" and is currently onto number 3.
Panasonic didn't stop plasma production because they were bleeding red but they couldn't justify the investment in next-gen 4k plasmas.
bfginger:a friend bought an f8500 51" and is currently onto number 3.
What did he have break down on them?
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Dunnersfella: I second the TH-55AS700 or the Sony KDL55L800B.
However the 800B doesn't seem to reveal the detail as much as the Panasonic, it appears to overly smooth the image, whereas the Panasonic seems more natural.
Sony seem to have gone backwards compared to last year, it's a pity.
Funny thing was a 47" Veon full HD TV had a better picture. Also the Veon has a Pioneer panel. Panasonic/Pioneer/Sony would be my picks.
shk292: I recently bought a new TV, was going to go for a Sony but liked the specs and picture on a Samsung. I have to say, although I hadn't been fussed about smart features before, the convenience of being able to access apps such as BBC iplayer direct from the TV, and having my NAS automatically appear on the "Source" OSD has really impressed me and has made the WAF of ditching Sky much easier.
Although Panasonic may have a great picture (I wouldn't know, the Samsung seems great to me), my Samsung TV has yet to fail to play any media file I have thrown at it. Compared to my Panasonic home cinema system, which plays about one file in ten, and isn't able (as far as I can tell) to have its region changed to use UK or US apps.
For Us, Samsung Smart (with Plex and TVNZ/TV3 on demand) and AppleTV with Netflix (could just as easily use a FireTV or Roku) is all we need. I don't need Sky for anything but Sport, and having to pay $80 a month for that is wearing really thin, though we do have a housemate who really wants Sky and is paying over the odds for it.
trig42:shk292: I recently bought a new TV, was going to go for a Sony but liked the specs and picture on a Samsung. I have to say, although I hadn't been fussed about smart features before, the convenience of being able to access apps such as BBC iplayer direct from the TV, and having my NAS automatically appear on the "Source" OSD has really impressed me and has made the WAF of ditching Sky much easier.
Although Panasonic may have a great picture (I wouldn't know, the Samsung seems great to me), my Samsung TV has yet to fail to play any media file I have thrown at it. Compared to my Panasonic home cinema system, which plays about one file in ten, and isn't able (as far as I can tell) to have its region changed to use UK or US apps.
The other good thing about Samsung Smart is you can get Plex for it (I think you can get it for LG too?), and if you are running a Plex Server, it makes the WAF go even higher. For Us, Samsung Smart (with Plex and TVNZ/TV3 on demand) and AppleTV with Netflix (could just as easily use a FireTV or Roku) is all we need. I don't need Sky for anything but Sport, and having to pay $80 a month for that is wearing really thin, though we do have a housemate who really wants Sky and is paying over the odds for it.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |