Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
Dunnersfella
4100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 887


  #2377336 17-Dec-2019 21:04
Send private message

At the budget the OP is looking at spending, ATMOS is either a waste of time or simply not available.

 

The Panasonic that was mentioned is probably the cheapest 'ATMOS' bar, but while it can decode ATMOS  DTS:X etc I doubt it can reproduce anything close to what you'd hope. As in example, it only has 3 x full range drivers  (not a driver + tweeter arrangement or even beam drivers that can fire the sound around the room) I wouldn't expect much in the way of performance - let alone ATMOS.

 

 

 

If you're spending 2K on a sound bar it can sound pretty good if you have a flat ceiling and square walls around you - if not, it's fairly 'meh'.

 

 

 

 

 

 




ANglEAUT
altered-ego
2436 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 842

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2377397 17-Dec-2019 23:38
Send private message

xpd:

 

... but price breaks the budget ;) Plus the shipping prob would too LOL

 

& at 110 decibel, your eardrums too. 😱





Please keep this GZ community vibrant by contributing in a constructive & respectful manner.


ShinyChrome
1603 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 686

ID Verified
Trusted

  #2377484 18-Dec-2019 09:00
Send private message

xpd:

 

Ideally, Id love to, but cant find any complete packages at a "budget" price these days. I could buy individual components but that gets costly - in saying that tho, could look at receiver with front speakers and build from there over time

 

I'm not an audiophile so getting the "perfect" sound quality/balance isnt a biggie for me.

 

 

I honestly hate the "audiophile" term, its a bit wanky really. To me, an "audiophile" is someone trying to tell you they can hear the difference between a $30 speaker cable and a $300 one.

 

For me, its about not getting the "perfect" sound, which is never going to happen outside a $500k expert designed cinema, but not getting rubbish sound. Sound bars are barely a step above a TV, but they are a massive compromise to sound quality for packaging and aesthetics. They have a time and a place, but if you can go with speakers + receiver, why not?

 

I would absolutely recommend the highlighted part above; a decent 2.0 setup will cost about the same as a sound bar (my receiver + first bookshelf speakers were less than $1000 new and not terrible), but sound a ton better. Best part of all, it can be added/upgraded to as the budget allows and every-time gets to be a new experience. I went from 2.0 > 3.0 > 5.1 and I couldn't be happier every time I get to "open the taps" for a well-mastered movie or song.




Resnick
242 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 58

Lifetime subscriber

  #2377515 18-Dec-2019 10:12
Send private message

A friend of mine just bought an Atmos compatible Sony soundbar as a compromise due to not being allowed a receiver and components by SHMBO. 

 

 

 

I have to say, it sounds pretty good; convincing object placement in the sound stage and plenty of grunt to match. 

 

Disclaimer: I'm definitely not an audiophile.


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.