new panasonic TV - soooo disapointed....

Forums › Home Theatre (including HTPC and EPG Collector) › new panasonic TV - soooo disapointed....

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

LookingUp

411 posts

Ultimate Geek

#1346152 17-Jul-2015 12:31

I still can't get past "read the manual but TV still in the box"!

dickytim

2514 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

#1346160 17-Jul-2015 12:35

I can't get past "read the manual"

LookingUp

411 posts

Ultimate Geek

#1346210 17-Jul-2015 13:03

dickytim: I can't get past "read the manual"

Agreed - I believe we need a Geekzone demerit point system for such things!

Rikkitic

Awrrr
18660 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#1346263 17-Jul-2015 14:12

Demerits aside, the argument that not everyone should have to pay for something only a few want is a good one. Then my question becomes how much does this added convenience actually add to mass production manufacturing cost? Is it really that expensive to include VGA in modern TVs? I wouldn't think so but I don't know. As an aside, I checked the Veon models at the Warehouse yesterday and they do, in fact, have VGA so I guess that makes the discussion somewhat academic.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

Batman

Mad Scientist
29763 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1346327 17-Jul-2015 15:31

It is possible that they make the generic (before they stick on the Veon sticker) tv for commercial use where they still plug their advertisement panel to old MS XP with VGA computers

Dunnersfella

4086 posts

Uber Geek

#1346390 17-Jul-2015 16:36

On an academic basis - would you prefer a TV with multiple connections or a TV with a superior picture quality?

Rikkitic

Awrrr
18660 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#1346404 17-Jul-2015 17:08

Dunnersfella: On an academic basis - would you prefer a TV with multiple connections or a TV with a superior picture quality?

I don't see a conflict between the two, but because I use different devices for different purposes it wouldn't be an issue anyway. For superior quality I have a Sony (with HDMI). No need or wish for VGA here. The TV I do want VGA on doesn't need to be high quality, because it is using VGA! 1080p is kind of wasted if you are set to 1360 x 768.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

Sharesies

Trade NZ and US shares and funds with Sharesies (affiliate link).

richms

28185 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1346446 17-Jul-2015 18:27

I wish my veon for gaming on had a 4th hdmi instead of that useless vga plug. Would mean I wouldn't need a hdmi switch for the consoles.

Richard rich.ms

Rikkitic

Awrrr
18660 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#1346459 17-Jul-2015 18:47

I wish my Sony had more than two HDMI ports. That is really stupid in a modern and otherwise good quality TV.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

Masterpiece

247 posts

Master Geek

#1346508 17-Jul-2015 20:15

@Richms The sharpness setting on the whole has not been that bad for the panels I have worked on in the past few years.

Mostly people have enjoyed overall improved panel quality despite choosing or using default settings that deviate from reference standards.

For VGA input, Panasonic have had up until recently pro panel models that allow for user instalment of input type with slot function boards. Unfortunately even they have dropped VGA slot boards, for those who want that now the only option is an external converter box.

Jaycar has this one for example

Me:"I'm not a robot!"

ET: "Maybe; you have some freewill, but you chose your path by arrangement"

Me "That sounds like a program with no freewill?"

ET: "We will catch up when you end this cycle"

Me: "Sounds like a 'KPI'!"

ET: "Did you read the terms and conditions?"

Me: .....

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5