MaxineN:
The other problem which I also forgot to mention in my opening post was that if people are relying on this as their literal source of truth and will not listen to the real human experience… then how does one actually get that through?
I've always liked the approach:
"Our truth is the intersection of independent lies" [Richard Levins]
I try to assume that any advice I get can be flawed - misinformed, misunderstood, possibly even badly intentioned.
Over many years with bulletin boards & tech-advice websites, I've occasionally seen flat-wrong advice.
And that predated anything but fictional AI.
But critical thinking seems to be on the wane - deliberately or not.
So if someone insists on spouting nonsense (as you see it) - simply say so & disengage.
I've done that all my life when confronted with religious mania - and several other forms of socially-acceptable mania.
My point is that I don't feel we need to try and come up with new 'rules' - to protect us from AI.
The old adage of the 'baby with the bathwater' applies.



