Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
khull
1245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 133


  #1060648 6-Jun-2014 23:42
Send private message

I actually came across this on WSJ and good to see discussion around it. But I can imagine the likes of certain individuals in the industry would like to 'close this immediately and move along, nothing to see here'

Then again, isn't this almost expected? I had to be somebody. Or would people rather huawei?



Dynamic
4015 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1852

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1060664 7-Jun-2014 00:39
Send private message

Just because we are not surprised about this does not make it right and does not mean that we should not seek to have this invasion of our privacy reversed.

We have privacy rights in NZ, so the 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear' argument is irrelevant to the conversation.

If the politicians bring out this argument, the appropriate response IMHO is 'OK so you won't have a problem if we monitor your phone calls and internet activity?'.  All of a sudden privacy becomes important to them.




“Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.” Douglas Adams


Athlonite
1828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 210
Inactive user


  #1060687 7-Jun-2014 02:46
Send private message

I'm with Dynamic on this I'm pretty damn sure I never gave the govt any authority to spy on me willy nilly I do however think that if they needed to then they should be getting a warrant from the courts to do so and should have to supply compelling evidence to support the request for a wire tap warrant    



sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

#1060690 7-Jun-2014 04:58
Send private message

Athlonite: I'm with Dynamic on this I'm pretty damn sure I never gave the govt any authority to spy on me willy nilly I do however think that if they needed to then they should be getting a warrant from the courts to do so and should have to supply compelling evidence to support the request for a wire tap warrant    


A warrant has always been required for voice LI or accessing of SMS messages.

This "story" has nothing to do with bulk spying. That's why it's not actually news.

Dynamic
4015 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1852

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1060737 7-Jun-2014 08:37
Send private message

sbiddle: This "story" has nothing to do with bulk spying. That's why it's not actually news.

sbiddle did you read the headline and the second line?  Is there any doubt that NZ is included?




“Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.” Douglas Adams


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1060745 7-Jun-2014 09:01
Send private message

I read the entire story and many others.

This story refers to monitoring of individuals. It is very different to mass interception of all calls and traffic for all users, hence my comment that this is not news. Lawful LI has been occurring in NZ for many years.

1 | 2 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.