Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
Apsattv
2453 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 725


  #2421960 16-Feb-2020 20:48
Send private message

I much prefer a throwaway STB  than a silly app that has it performance degraded based on the TV/os/cpu engine. We all recall the fiasco of the RWC where different tv's performed poorly as some of the modern smartv's are barely functional in terms of performance.

 

I would rather chip out $99 for a new stb for that  "old" tv that can't do something like the up and coming H266 codec which is likely to be used for 4k and 8K in a few years time.

 

Actually are Vodafone stream using HEVC (H265) or the older H264 format?

 

 




Benoire

2878 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 681


  #2424461 20-Feb-2020 12:21
Send private message

The more I think about this, the more I wonder how sustainable this service is.  If VF are expecting money to flow in from Sky subs I wonder how this will affect the viability going forwards when Sky release their own apps.  At what point does the free aspects (cloud recording, IPTV distribution etc.) start to become a cost?  I presume as part of the general VF broadband offering its added value to encourage use but those not on the VF network would simply be a drain... 


wazzageek
1095 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 108

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2424473 20-Feb-2020 12:51
Send private message

Benoire:

 

The more I think about this, the more I wonder how sustainable this service is.  If VF are expecting money to flow in from Sky subs I wonder how this will affect the viability going forwards when Sky release their own apps.  At what point does the free aspects (cloud recording, IPTV distribution etc.) start to become a cost?  I presume as part of the general VF broadband offering its added value to encourage use but those not on the VF network would simply be a drain... 

 

 

I had (naively) thought that there may be a cost to re-transmit on the vodafone tv platform - I'm sure I saw something somewhere that showed the cost of broadcasting via the Freeview platform, but my google-fu fails me currently.  The more I think about it though, it does seem somewhat counter-intuitive for Vodafone to charge for transmission.  *shrugs*




Benoire

2878 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 681


  #2424479 20-Feb-2020 13:03
Send private message

There will be a cost for the cloud recording function and data transmit will have a minor cost I suspect but it might be the same for 1 user as for 1000 so that probably would be covered by the broad band added value stuff... I guess I hope that hte cost is so minor that either an app purchase cost or bx puchase will give VF enough money to keep this going...


sansom
421 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 207

Trusted
One NZ

  #2424552 20-Feb-2020 14:39
Send private message

Apsattv:

 

I much prefer a throwaway STB  than a silly app that has it performance degraded based on the TV/os/cpu engine. We all recall the fiasco of the RWC where different tv's performed poorly as some of the modern smartv's are barely functional in terms of performance.

 

I would rather chip out $99 for a new stb for that  "old" tv that can't do something like the up and coming H266 codec which is likely to be used for 4k and 8K in a few years time.

 

Actually are Vodafone stream using HEVC (H265) or the older H264 format?

 

 

 

 

Hi @Apsattv, agreed, the fragmentation and variability of the Smart TV device market is one of the primary reasons for having a box.  With an App-centric approach, only Netflix and increasingly Amazon Prime Video have achieved coverage across the majority of TV hardware devices.  Then there is the cost of testing against the supported Smart TVs.  

 

The VTV box, while capable of HEVC, uses H264 currently.





Hamish


Hammerer
2480 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 802

Lifetime subscriber

  #2424610 20-Feb-2020 17:16
Send private message

Benoire:

 

The more I think about this, the more I wonder how sustainable this service is.  If VF are expecting money to flow in from Sky subs I wonder how this will affect the viability going forwards when Sky release their own apps.  At what point does the free aspects (cloud recording, IPTV distribution etc.) start to become a cost?  I presume as part of the general VF broadband offering its added value to encourage use but those not on the VF network would simply be a drain... 

 

 

Vodafone will be subsidising non-Vodafone customers for the transmission costs but that cost should be easily covered by potential benefits:

 

a) new Sky subscribers using Vodafone distribution

 

b) easier onboarding of those customers with nearly instant activation given that the device is already installed

 

c) customer retention, despite easing the move from Vodafone-supplied broadband because the Vodafone TV service will be available to me for a "small" fixed price. But the net effect right now is that I'm happier to stay put knowing that they have given me this option. Some other customers will have a different view on this.

 

d) economies of scale. Typically telecommunication has high fixed costs and very low marginal costs so profitability rapidly increases with increasing market share.

 

e) if they can establish Vodafone TV ubiquity, i.e. have it commonly used in many or most NZ households, then there will be significant benefits from controlling the distribution channel.

 

I know that monopoly is often bad but I think this is a really smart move when us consumers are facing increasingly fragmented access to content.

 

 


 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
Benoire

2878 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 681


  #2424885 21-Feb-2020 10:47
Send private message

I don't have such a problem about monopolies as long as they don't make excessive profit and with most onshore public companies you can see where the money flow lies.  Fragmentation is generally a bad thing so I applaud VF for doing something good!  The main reason I want it in single app form is that I hate having multiple remotes that get lost by the kids... and as I use Android TV I can move around from inbuilt to STB as the devices get old but the interface will generally remain the same as well as function...I can understand the various other smart tv types and their limited life spans; I had a 2012 Samsung smart tv that by about 2014 was starting to lose apps and content!


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.