Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
Perrin
40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  #230197 2-Jul-2009 10:25
Send private message

These ones haven't been taken down yet.  [Mildly NSFW in case that wasn't obvious from the discussion!]



tonyhughes
Hawkes Bay
8476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #230207 2-Jul-2009 10:44
Send private message

And if that disappears, they are here (also NSFW)







velofille
42 posts

Geek

Trusted

  #230208 2-Jul-2009 10:46
Send private message

I heard they took them down because they had some kinda Hacker OS on them called Linux!



tonyhughes
Hawkes Bay
8476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #230215 2-Jul-2009 11:12
Send private message

velofille: I heard they took them down because they had some kinda Hacker OS on them called Linux!

lol

Welcome to forums Liz. :o)







wownerf
25 posts

Geek


  #230216 2-Jul-2009 11:16
Send private message

FYI - Voda is saying its a 'supply issue'

http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/vodafone-google-phone-coming-back-104601

Interesting snippet about apple and the iphone which was in but has now been removed from the origonal Computerworld article (See below for link).

patatrat
261 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #230218 2-Jul-2009 11:19
Send private message

The more I think about this, the less it makes sense that the reason is the body painted girls. Surely Google, of all companies realise that pulling a product will generate more publicity then any photos posted on a blog (Streisand effect). The Computer World article also mentions Apple not being happy at the launch being so close to the iphone - surely this would have been an issue months ago and would have been resolved then rather then a week after the launch, so that couldn't be the reason.

The reason could be the photos of the launch party - but it just seems too much of an excessive response.

 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).

xpd

xpd
Geek of Coastguard
14116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4579

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #230222 2-Jul-2009 11:26
Send private message

Computerworld have an article about it also...

http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/netw/D64B616E056577FECC2575E6007875D1?opendocument&utm_source=topnews&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=topnews




XPD / Gavin

 

LinkTree

 

 

 


tonyhughes
Hawkes Bay
8476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #230225 2-Jul-2009 11:35
Send private message

 


 

















(Disclaimer: I strongly advise against directly posting pics in this thread)







MikeGayner
183 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user


  #230231 2-Jul-2009 11:47
Send private message

Erm, none of this makes any sense. Why would they pull the phone because of some body painted girls? It's utterly consequential, and considering the phone has a great stonking GOOGLE logo written over it, I can't see why Google would object to their name/logo being used.

It just seems some less educated folk have started some baseless rumour and it's being spread in typical fashion. Does anyone have any REAL reasons why this phone may have been "pulled"? It seems that inventory levels is a much more plausable explination.

Perrin
40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  #230236 2-Jul-2009 11:54
Send private message

Supply issues? If you have supply issues you wouldn't pull existing stock from store shelves, would you? And you wouldn't pull all the informational material from your website, you'd just put a message on the order page saying how popular the phone was and encouraging people order so they are guaranteed to get one from the next shipment.

I do agree though that pulling items from sale because of something to do with a launch party makes very little sense too.

Google having a problem with their logo being on the back of the phone, that is plausible (if by some mistake it hadn't been approved).

MikeGayner
183 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user


  #230237 2-Jul-2009 11:57
Send private message

Google having a problem with their logo being on the back of the phone, that is plausible.

I agree - it's possible arrangements weren't finalised or some licensing details were overlooked on release. Makes a lot more sense than inconsequential launch party shenanigans.

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
robnz1
5 posts

Wannabe Geek


  #230245 2-Jul-2009 12:34
Send private message

Thet've retracted the 'Supply issue' comment now.



As to the Google logo on the phones, they're 'Google Experience' phones. (One of the three options for vendors to deploy Android phones)



http://www.topandroidphones.com/post/Why-Androids-Three-Flavours-Are-Good-News-For-Carriers-And-Manufacturers.aspx


ALL the Vodafone Magics around the world have the Google logo on the back. It's HTC that doesn't get a look in.

Correction - The HTC logo is on the camera lens plate

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80661 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41078

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #230255 2-Jul-2009 12:54
Send private message

Ben has now uploaded (again) the pictures Vodafone had asked him to remove:

http://www.ben.geek.nz/learning-from-the-vodafone-htc-magic-debacle/





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80661 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41078

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#230390 2-Jul-2009 19:33
Send private message

MikeGayner: Erm, none of this makes any sense. Why would they pull the phone because of some body painted girls? It's utterly consequential, and considering the phone has a great stonking GOOGLE logo written over it, I can't see why Google would object to their name/logo being used.


There are stricty rules on how to use logos and trademarks. The phones have Google all over them but you don't see the Google logo over naked girls. It's very different use.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80661 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41078

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#230583 3-Jul-2009 09:15
Send private message

Computerworld reports the HTC Magic is back on sale.




Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.