Video calling a flop?

Forums › One NZ (including Farmside) › Video calling a flop?

1 | 2

paradoxsm

3000 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#43508 8-Aug-2006 11:43

Video calling is useful, I never had a problem with it, I could just flip the handset to me ear and yak away and the person at the other end got pictures of whatever my ear was pointing at (SE V800)

When you can use national videocall minutes like national voice minutes, It would make it far more attractive.

richms

29099 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10211

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#43547 8-Aug-2006 15:09

simon_nz90: Thats not true...

Ok your included minutes arnt used up for video calling, but your standard calling rate, eg 79c per min on Choose 60, is the same rate for making a video call. So video calling is the same rate as vocie calling, even on a plan.

So its not "15¢ per min" then, which means that it is more expensive.

Richard rich.ms

cokemaster

Exited
4937 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Retired Mod

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#43549 8-Aug-2006 15:12

I've written a blog post about this subject. In it I've compared the included minute cost vs the cost of video calling etc.

Its interesting that only two of the On Account plans actually have the same cost for voice minutes (providing you are using included minutes) as video calling, those two are the TXT 150 plan and the Choose 20 plan.

webhosting

Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!

sbiddle

30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod

Trusted

Biddle Corp

Lifetime subscriber

#43550 8-Aug-2006 15:37

In fairness to Vodafone however matching the price of video calling with voice calling in all situations simply couldn't happen. The network capacity for video calling is far less than voice.

Jama

1420 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#43553 8-Aug-2006 16:42

sbiddle: The network capacity for video calling is far less than voice.

Are you sure you have that around the right way??

taniwha

961 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#43558 8-Aug-2006 17:37

freitasm: I read the article, thanks for the link Jama... That comes back to one of my thoughts: The killer app for mobile is... voice!

yik.. i'm not a big fan of voice.. it's intrusive - it must be acknowledged immeditely - it interupts. people don't call because they don't want to interupt.

for myself, killer app is sms. It can be ignored for a good 10 minutes without being rude.. yet it can also be instant.

Geekzone

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).

sbiddle

30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod

Trusted

Biddle Corp

Lifetime subscriber

#43560 8-Aug-2006 17:57

Jama:
sbiddle: The network capacity for video calling is far less than voice.

Are you sure you have that around the right way??

I read a document online a while back detailing it. Both UMTS video calling and voice tie up a 64Kbps CS channel however when video calling increased on a cell the uplink power became excessively high affecting capacity and coverage on the cell. Maybe it's just a network design/management issue rather than a UMTS specific limitation on every network.

1 | 2