|
|
|
johnr: Changing the IuB routing from 1 RNC to another is not a quick change just before christmas we starting migrating 3G cells from manukau RNC to Frankton RNC And this took alot of planning so there was no impact to customers.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
sbiddle:cafeg: Ahh, It sounds like someone said
" its a one in a million chance it won't break so we don't need GSM ! "
People need to build and bridge get over the concept that Telecom should have built a "backup" GSM network. The idea has absolutely no logic or merit.
ajw:sbiddle:ajw:
Good to hear. It amazes me more RNC's were not included in the specifications when the XT network was built. One only has to look at the past history of Telecom mobile to note they hardly ever get it right.
Why is it amazing? Why do you believe Telecom needed more than 2 RNC's?
What I can't understand is why people are so hung up about the number of RNC's in a network. Greater numbers of RNC's DO NOT make a better network. If Telecom had 6 RNC's they would still only have a single RNC in the South Island. Why? Because there is not the population to support more. The issue that occured would have still affected the South Island and would have taken just as long to repair.
Likewise if Vodafone had suffered the same RNC issue in Chch as Telecom suffered Vodafone would have been without 3G coverage across the South Island also and would have been in the same boat.
sbiddle:ajw:
Good to hear. It amazes me more RNC's were not included in the specifications when the XT network was built. One only has to look at the past history of Telecom mobile to note they hardly ever get it right.
Why is it amazing? Why do you believe Telecom needed more than 2 RNC's?
PaulBrislen: The point isn't 'how big is your RNC?' but rather 'how many customers are affected if it breaks?'. Vodafone has decided to have fewer customers per RNC rather than risking an outage that affects a large number of customers.
For me, and I've stressed this to the media, the more important point is around fallback capability. If one of our RNCs were to do what Telecom's did, all of our customers would fail over to the slower network. Yes, it would be inconvenient but voice and TXTs would continue, albeit with the associated issues around data speed and possible congestion.
Cheers
Paul
sbiddle: Are you 100% sure 2degrees have 3 RNC's? I'm not sure that they do. I know they have 3 softswitches.
The point I'm making is that it doesn't matter how many RNC's you have an RNC failure is going to lead to an outage. With all 3 networks a Chch RNC failure will lead to a total loss of 3G service for the South Island, in that respect you would have to argue that all 3 networks are no better than each other.
sbiddle:
All data traffic is routed via the RNC's and SGSN and or GGSN before it hits the internet, as data speeds have got faster it puts more load on the network. Bypassing the RNC for data is currently being trialled by some networks and would mean additional RNC's were not needed to handle significant additional data capacity.
|
|
|