Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 
Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #1620095 31-Aug-2016 09:50
Send private message

To return briefly to the matter of national defense, I have noticed a number of news items recently on the increasing cyber threat to New Zealand, with ransomware being the current subject de jour and attacks like this being linked to terrorism, both as a source of finance and a means of disruption. I can just see the national grid going down and the banks being emptied and people milling in confusion when the ATMs stop working while our borders are ringed by costly ships and tanks standing by uselessly. 

 

I am all for defense, but the way to survive in today's world is to be smarter than your opponent. Those who think bigger guns mean more security are living in the 19th century or have seen too many American action movies. Any attack is not going to come over the seas, but through our computers. Smart defense is investing in better schools, more education, and specialist resources. That is where the money wasted on the military should be going.

 

 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 




Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1620097 31-Aug-2016 09:55
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

To return briefly to the matter of national defense, I have noticed a number of news items recently on the increasing cyber threat to New Zealand, with ransomware being the current subject de jour and attacks like this being linked to terrorism, both as a source of finance and a means of disruption. I can just see the national grid going down and the banks being emptied and people milling in confusion when the ATMs stop working while our borders are ringed by costly ships and tanks standing by uselessly. 

 

I am all for defense, but the way to survive in today's world is to be smarter than your opponent. Those who think bigger guns mean more security are living in the 19th century or have seen too many American action movies. Any attack is not going to come over the seas, but through our computers. Smart defense is investing in better schools, more education, and specialist resources. That is where the money wasted on the military should be going.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We are getting there. 

 

 

 

When I first arrived in NZ 12 years ago and was working in Wellington, Ministers were still having Red Box correspondence left unattended in their post boxes in their constituency homes when they were away from Wellington! You can't expect security to catch up too fast...!






MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1620098 31-Aug-2016 09:56
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

To return briefly to the matter of national defense, I have noticed a number of news items recently on the increasing cyber threat to New Zealand, with ransomware being the current subject de jour and attacks like this being linked to terrorism, both as a source of finance and a means of disruption. I can just see the national grid going down and the banks being emptied and people milling in confusion when the ATMs stop working while our borders are ringed by costly ships and tanks standing by uselessly. 

 

I am all for defense, but the way to survive in today's world is to be smarter than your opponent. Those who think bigger guns mean more security are living in the 19th century or have seen too many American action movies. Any attack is not going to come over the seas, but through our computers. Smart defense is investing in better schools, more education, and specialist resources. That is where the money wasted on the military should be going.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You cant invade a nation through fibre, when it comes to invasion who has the biggest and the most guns generally wins. The reality for NZ is Fiji could invade us and probably win.





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.




shk292
2916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2040

Lifetime subscriber

  #1626439 9-Sep-2016 11:37
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

To return briefly to the matter of national defense, I have noticed a number of news items recently on the increasing cyber threat to New Zealand, with ransomware being the current subject de jour and attacks like this being linked to terrorism, both as a source of finance and a means of disruption. I can just see the national grid going down and the banks being emptied and people milling in confusion when the ATMs stop working while our borders are ringed by costly ships and tanks standing by uselessly. 

 

I am all for defense, but the way to survive in today's world is to be smarter than your opponent. Those who think bigger guns mean more security are living in the 19th century or have seen too many American action movies. Any attack is not going to come over the seas, but through our computers. Smart defense is investing in better schools, more education, and specialist resources. That is where the money wasted on the military should be going.

 

 

 

I think that's an oversimplification.  You need both, which is why the government is maintaining a traditional defence force while also boosting funding for cyber.

 

Cyber defence isn't going to stop a basic, low tech invasion - whereas conventional forces act as a deterrent against this.  Of course, our mutual cooperation with larger allies acts as the true deterrent and this needs to be a two-way street


shk292
2916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2040

Lifetime subscriber

  #1626444 9-Sep-2016 11:43
Send private message

Back to the original topic, it's worth noting that the Police have decided not to proceed further with the complaint that was lodged, based on "At this stage there is no evidence to indicate offending".

 

In my opinion this is the right response; there is a very wide difference between a fund manager buying previously-owned shares in large companies that manufacture contravening munitions as a small part of their business, and for instance direct investment in a start-up wanting to develop cluster munitions.  It would seem that the current law seeks to prevent the latter, not the current type of investments.

 

Of course, many might wish to totally avoid these companies and they are free to do so by selecting an appropriate investment.


frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1626510 9-Sep-2016 12:43
Send private message

Equally, I'd like to know how much of my KiwiSaver is invested with tax thieves like Apple and Google. Can I avoid having my money put into them?

 

 


 
 
 

Shop on-line at New World now for your groceries (affiliate link).

gzt

gzt
18689 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7827

Lifetime subscriber

  #1626533 9-Sep-2016 13:14
Send private message

The major fund concerned has already announced plans to create a default fund package in line with the expectations of their customers:

Westpac, ASB and Grosvenor have since dumped the fund or were in the process of doing so, while Kiwibank is still reviewing its investment.

Vanguard head of market strategy Robin Bowerman said the company was now in talks with its major clients in New Zealand about coming up with a better solution.

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/312705/kiwisaver-manager-moves-on-weapons-investments

1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.