jeffnz:
They were measuring honesty, not aggression.
Why do you find it necessary to defend National Jeff? Is this an emotional response to a perceived threat? Surely, if the study is wrong, science will deal with it more authoritatively than you or I could ever do. Why the leap to defense?
Does the study not talk about wealthy people?
Are there not wealthy people in National?
Why should we assume National is immune to the behaviors identified?
Or is it simply that I named National and not Labour? It applies to both. But I named only one. Did I do an experiment of my own?
.
If you are just trolling I could think of better ways than than what you have used. Hope you get the reaction you are after for whatever you are trying to prove.
I would have reacted to whomever you decided to use so don't go clapping your hands with joy at your first bite.
I don't troll. I don't have the energy.
I do notice when people can't answer however.