![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
jaymz: I'm just miffed that I didn't think or do this earlier! Would have been a nice side income!
scuwp: Gosh, leave the poor industrious fella alone, he's just trying to make a living. Talk about tall poppy syndrome! It's not like he is doing anything really serious like downloading pirated movies or something (LOL)
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
jjnz1:keewee01: ...then he is using Microsoft's name and logo's illegally.
I don't think it is illegal because it is a genuine Microsoft product. He has just format shifted it.
Morally it is questionable, but not illegal.
#include <standard.disclaimer>
freitasm: However I am pretty sure the Microsoft software is not supposed and not licenced to be redistributed like that.
PaulBrislen: Pish. Inserting yourself into the internet as a middle man, clipping the ticket and not doing anything of value is to be rubbished for the poor excuse for a business that it is. ;-)
see also, VARs that don't AV, music producers and television networks that refuse to screen shows they've already bought.
DonGould:freitasm: However I am pretty sure the Microsoft software is not supposed and not licenced to be redistributed like that.
While I agree? you're quite right, there comes a point where even Microsoft aren't totally stupid.
If the guys was claiming 'this is the only way to get service pack x...' then yes, I'd agree, that's not on.
But all this guys doing is providing a service and frankly the $10 cost is a great education tool that providers like Microsoft should be right behind.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
DonGould:freitasm: However I am pretty sure the Microsoft software is not supposed and not licenced to be redistributed like that.
While I agree you're quite right, there comes a point where even Microsoft aren't totally stupid.
If the guys was claiming 'this is the only way to get service pack x...' then yes, I'd agree, that's not on.
But all this guys doing is providing a service and frankly the $10 cost is a great education tool that providers like Microsoft should be right behind.
Kyanar: Providers like Microsoft are already right behind it. They've offered service pack CDs for postage since always.
scottjpalmer:Kyanar: Providers like Microsoft are already right behind it. They've offered service pack CDs for postage since always.
That is provided by Microsoft on a disc they have created.
The issue freitasm refers to is people downloading the service pack from the MS website, injecting a trojan or otherwise into the file/disc image and then burning it to a disc to be "sold" to someone else.
Kyanar:scottjpalmer:Kyanar:?Providers like Microsoft are already right behind it. ? They've offered service pack CDs for postage since always.
That is provided by Microsoft on a disc they have created.
The issue freitasm refers to is people downloading the service pack from the MS website, injecting a trojan or otherwise into the file/disc image and then burning it to a disc to be "sold" to someone else.?
I was replying to Don Gould's suggestion that the $10 fee is an education tool that first parties should get behind, by pointing out that they already are.?
scottjpalmer:Kyanar: Providers like Microsoft are already right behind it. They've offered service pack CDs for postage since always.
That is provided by Microsoft on a disc they have created.
The issue freitasm refers to is people downloading the service pack from the MS website, injecting a trojan or otherwise into the file/disc image and then burning it to a disc to be "sold" to someone else.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |