Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

  #1295002 1-May-2015 13:15
Send private message

mclean: Going back to the OP, I wonder if it's a form of station identification, which is a legal requirement for some broadcast radio transmissions. I think on US TV it's at least few seconds at the top of the hour.  UK TV stations seem to do the same.  Also radio stations here but more frequently than that. Just guessing.


My guess is it has to do with watermarking to protect copyright. Probably forced on broadcasters by the IP mafia. This makes it easy to identify the source of anything that has been copied. Of course it could also just be another case of mindless imitation. Someone somewhere started doing it as brand identification so everyone everywhere else wants to jump on the bandwagon. I have satellite TV and I am not aware of any broadcaster anywhere in the world who does not advertise their logo in this way.
 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 




Geektastic

18010 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8468

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1295133 1-May-2015 16:17
Send private message

mclean: Going back to the OP, I wonder if it's a form of station identification, which is a legal requirement for some broadcast radio transmissions. I think on US TV it's at least few seconds at the top of the hour.  UK TV stations seem to do the same.  Also radio stations here but more frequently than that. Just guessing.



30 seconds post each of the (excessive!) ad breaks would be bearable. I see no need for it to be there the whole time - some of them are burned in to my plasma screen now!





MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12769

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1295148 1-May-2015 16:21
Send private message

Geektastic:
mclean: Going back to the OP, I wonder if it's a form of station identification, which is a legal requirement for some broadcast radio transmissions. I think on US TV it's at least few seconds at the top of the hour.  UK TV stations seem to do the same.  Also radio stations here but more frequently than that. Just guessing.



30 seconds post each of the (excessive!) ad breaks would be bearable. I see no need for it to be there the whole time - some of them are burned in to my plasma screen now!


Screen burn in from a water mark would be very rare given the 'movement' behind the water mark. Do you live pause a lot ?




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.




bfginger
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 191


  #1295173 1-May-2015 17:06
Send private message

They're in competition with each other to make them as obnoxious as they can get away with. With each new revision they make them larger and less transparent. It must be possible to fade them out with a HTPC, is anyone doing that?

Geektastic

18010 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8468

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1295184 1-May-2015 17:31
Send private message

MikeB4:
Geektastic:
mclean: Going back to the OP, I wonder if it's a form of station identification, which is a legal requirement for some broadcast radio transmissions. I think on US TV it's at least few seconds at the top of the hour.  UK TV stations seem to do the same.  Also radio stations here but more frequently than that. Just guessing.



30 seconds post each of the (excessive!) ad breaks would be bearable. I see no need for it to be there the whole time - some of them are burned in to my plasma screen now!


Screen burn in from a water mark would be very rare given the 'movement' behind the water mark. Do you live pause a lot ?


Yes - I get interrupted! You can see the My Sky Pause logo too.





Geektastic

18010 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8468

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1295185 1-May-2015 17:31
Send private message

bfginger: They're in competition with each other to make them as obnoxious as they can get away with. With each new revision they make them larger and less transparent. It must be possible to fade them out with a HTPC, is anyone doing that?


No idea what an HPTC is but someone better be working on it...!





 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).

ojo

ojo
167 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 28


  #1295298 1-May-2015 19:52
Send private message

old3eyes: Anyone remember about 15 years ago TV3  ran  a promotion to get a free sticker and place it at the right bottom corner of your TV screen for a couple of weeks and win a free   prize??    Just a big marketing have but indicated to the marketing bunnies by the amount of stickers that hey gave away that people were quite happy with a bug on their TV screens..

Tellydots. People went mad for that. I think I still have couple of them somewhere...

muppet
2644 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1662

Trusted

  #1295325 1-May-2015 21:44
Send private message

Geektastic: This is bugging me.

Why is it necessary to have a stupid logo interfere with my viewing?

Also annoying are ads for other programs sliding onto the one I am watching - no need for that either.

Who thinks up these things and why do they think it either good or necessary?


Ugh I know. It's like those people that have a big dumb speedtest image on the end of everything they posay is that the time? Seesh I'd better go I'll be late.

aros71
122 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  #1296321 3-May-2015 22:42
Send private message

rugrat: They just do it because they seem intent on annoying their customers as much as possible


Except in this transaction you are not the customer - you are the product.

The customer is the one who pays - ie the advertisers, in the case of broadcast TV.

It is your eyeballs (or more accurately your attention) that is being sold by TV channels to their advertisers.




Adam Rosner

rugrat
3142 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 945

Lifetime subscriber

  #1296379 4-May-2015 01:33
Send private message

aros71:
rugrat: They just do it because they seem intent on annoying their customers as much as possible


Except in this transaction you are not the customer - you are the product.

The customer is the one who pays - ie the advertisers, in the case of broadcast TV.

It is your eyeballs (or more accurately your attention) that is being sold by TV channels to their advertisers.


Yep, but they don't need to have station identifiers, to have their advertisers be happy. If having bugs on screen stops some people from watching then they are delivering less value to their customers, the advertisers.

And in skys case on the zone channel, all the breaks are self promotion ones, not worth a penny to them and people are paying them around $50 for start up channels, they're just making the streaming services more attractive, but since they're intent on annoying customers less eye balls on their screens.



If it wasn't for other people in house sky would be gone tomorrow, and I've already stopped watching most freeview programs, only watch first 15 minutes of news now, and the flash is only program I'm watching on it.

Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #1297451 4-May-2015 09:44
Send private message

MikeB4:
Geektastic:
mclean: Going back to the OP, I wonder if it's a form of station identification, which is a legal requirement for some broadcast radio transmissions. I think on US TV it's at least few seconds at the top of the hour.  UK TV stations seem to do the same.  Also radio stations here but more frequently than that. Just guessing.



30 seconds post each of the (excessive!) ad breaks would be bearable. I see no need for it to be there the whole time - some of them are burned in to my plasma screen now!


Screen burn in from a water mark would be very rare given the 'movement' behind the water mark. Do you live pause a lot ?


Not as rare as the the manufacturers would have you believe. I have the top of the line Panasonic plasma from the second to last year they still made plasmas (so only a couple of years old), and I have the TV 2 logo burned in. Never pause live TV. And it didn't take long to get there, first noticed it after only a couple of months and I don't even watch a lot of free to air TV

TV2's on screen logo is a lot more opaque than the other channels, perhaps they are aiming to advertise to you regardless of what channel you are watching.




 Home:                                                           Work:
Home Work


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
Geektastic

18010 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8468

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1297463 4-May-2015 10:06
Send private message

aros71:
rugrat: They just do it because they seem intent on annoying their customers as much as possible


Except in this transaction you are not the customer - you are the product.

The customer is the one who pays - ie the advertisers, in the case of broadcast TV.

It is your eyeballs (or more accurately your attention) that is being sold by TV channels to their advertisers.


So which am I when watching Sky, who still have ads and identifiers despite billing me every month?!





frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1297563 4-May-2015 12:24
Send private message

Geektastic:
aros71:
rugrat: They just do it because they seem intent on annoying their customers as much as possible


Except in this transaction you are not the customer - you are the product.

The customer is the one who pays - ie the advertisers, in the case of broadcast TV.

It is your eyeballs (or more accurately your attention) that is being sold by TV channels to their advertisers.


So which am I when watching Sky, who still have ads and identifiers despite billing me every month?!


You're the product that pays :)

mdooher
Hmm, what to write...
1443 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 910

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1297620 4-May-2015 13:08
Send private message

Paul1977:
MikeB4:
Geektastic:
mclean: Going back to the OP, I wonder if it's a form of station identification, which is a legal requirement for some broadcast radio transmissions. I think on US TV it's at least few seconds at the top of the hour.  UK TV stations seem to do the same.  Also radio stations here but more frequently than that. Just guessing.



30 seconds post each of the (excessive!) ad breaks would be bearable. I see no need for it to be there the whole time - some of them are burned in to my plasma screen now!


Screen burn in from a water mark would be very rare given the 'movement' behind the water mark. Do you live pause a lot ?


Not as rare as the the manufacturers would have you believe. I have the top of the line Panasonic plasma from the second to last year they still made plasmas (so only a couple of years old), and I have the TV 2 logo burned in. Never pause live TV. And it didn't take long to get there, first noticed it after only a couple of months and I don't even watch a lot of free to air TV

TV2's on screen logo is a lot more opaque than the other channels, perhaps they are aiming to advertise to you regardless of what channel you are watching.


I have TV2 logo burn in on my telly too. Mind you, I do have a 17 year old  Panasonic projection television




Matthew


JimmyH
2898 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1554


  #1297864 4-May-2015 19:05
Send private message

rugrat:

If it wasn't for other people in house sky would be gone tomorrow, and I've already stopped watching most freeview programs, only watch first 15 minutes of news now, and the flash is only program I'm watching on it.


Yep. It's the same on many of the other Sky channels, and is the principal reason I'm close to dumping Sky. Why they would go to all that time and effort to gratuitously annoy someone paying them circa $100 a month is beyond me. If I wanted my programmes constantly interrupted by promos, pop up banners, and loud voiceovers when the credits run, I would watch Freeview.

Back on topic, I can still really see no useful purpose for the channel logos. There are other ways of marking a content stream, such as briefly flashing it up or using an invisible watermark, and the info button on remotes means it's dead simple to check which channel you are on. Other than annoying people and potentially driving viewership down, I can't see what they actually achieve?

I agree with the sentiment of an earlier poster - it's no wonder people are so keen to abandon broadcast TV for alternatives - Netflix anyone? laughing

(If GZ ever hosted an "ask TVNZ" or "ask Sky" thread, these are questions I would be interested in seeing responses to).

1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.