mattwnz:
i do wonder how much lobbying is going on in parliament to prevent this information being provided where they try to use these arguments . UK seems to provide far more info to the consumer and their food prices can far a lot cheaper
Well we know how much kick back there was from the grocery council or whatever they call themselves when it was suggested all packaging adopt a traffic light system to quickly indicate how (un) healthy packaged food is.
The resistance was nothing to do with how profitable the unhealthiest food is, of course.
Anyway, turns out labelling may be the wrong way to head.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/365726/nutritional-labels-on-food-have-little-effect-research
Prevailing thought amongst neo-liberal economists is to use a price signal instead. This is the way to also effect any desired wishes for food security. Imported food would be taxed making it economic to sell the local variety as well (or instead).
But who is going to be in charge of deciding what food is unhealthier and therefore becomes taxed? What a bureaucratic nightmare. Which politician wants to be known for 'taking away toffeepops from hardworking kiwi mums and dads' ?
And who is going to welcome increased food prices during a cost of living crisis that seems to have no end?


