joff_nz: Yes but IMO a stated 12 month warranty on a $200 phone with the same or similar features to some $500 sets an expectation of how long it might last, say compared to said $500 phone.
If a phone has high features and a low price, then something has to give, in this case it seems it is build quality. Just like If I buy a $500 couch from the warehouse, I wouldn't expect it to last as long as a $1250 couch from Farmers.
What I'm saying, that taking into account the price of the phone compared to the market, I don't think a year is unreasonable.
I disagree. I would expect the $200 phone to last just as long as the $500 one. The materials on the $500 phone may be nicer so it might have fewer scratches etc, but in terms of actual operation I wouldn't expect a difference. What you're paying for with a more expensive phone is brand, design, features, speed, battery life, but I don't believe expensive phones last any longer than cheap ones. The warranty period is no indication whatsoever of the expected life on the item.