Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Technofreak
6657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3477

Trusted

  #2763857 20-Aug-2021 14:44
Send private message

Fred99:

 

tdgeek:

 

Fusion would solve a LOT of things globally, but last time I watched doco on it, it was 50 years away. IIRC the fusion was just nanoseconds at the moment

 

 

Wait...

 

I'm sure I read something 50 years ago suggesting that fusion power generation would be 50 years away.

 

Oh - and it's still going to generate some radioactive waste.

 

 

Baby steps here earlier this month, described as being akin to the Wright Brother's first flight. Also acknowledged there is a long way to go. 50 years? Who knows, I think less. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/17/lawrence-livermore-lab-makes-significant-achievement-in-fusion.html 

 

As for the waste. No matter what form of energy we have today there is some form of waste or a downside. It's just a matter of which one gives the best outcome over all.





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5




Handle9
11925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2763870 20-Aug-2021 15:17
Send private message

duckDecoy:

 

driller2000:

 

TL:DR - Too hard + Too expensive + We have better lower cost alternative options = It will never happen in NZ.

 

 

This.

 

Almost zero western countries have nuclear plant building projects underway and the countries that do have state involvement, so its not just ill suited to NZ.  They are considered incredibly risky as the capital costs can be enormous.

 

 

Don't come in with logic. This thread is about middle aged men with their reckons.

 

Coincidentally it's always the same at BBQs. It's never the grandmothers or teenage girls who reach for the nuke card.


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2763874 20-Aug-2021 15:24
Send private message

@Handle9 you are right if you mention the need for nuclear power around my wife or daughter and that person will hear about the Will Wheaton law.
My sons will agree with them.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.




Handle9
11925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2763875 20-Aug-2021 15:27
Send private message

MikeB4: @Handle9 you are right if you mention the need for nuclear power around my wife or daughter and that person will hear about the Will Wheaton law.
My sons will agree with them.

 

OT but could you quote instead of doing an @ please? It gives two notifications and isn't necessary. 


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2763877 20-Aug-2021 15:33
Send private message

I thought @freitasm asked us to limit quoting where we can. If its OK not a problem I will quote





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Handle9
11925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2763878 20-Aug-2021 15:34
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

I thought @freitasm asked us to limit quoting where we can. If its OK not a problem I will quote

 

 

Quotes are hard limited so not a problem.


 
 
 

Support Geekzone with one-off or recurring donations Donate via PressPatron.
MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2763881 20-Aug-2021 15:39
Send private message

Handle9:

 

 

 

Quotes are hard limited so not a problem.

 

 

Good point I forgot that. Doh!





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Dingbatt
6804 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3694

Lifetime subscriber

  #2763886 20-Aug-2021 15:48
Send private message

Handle9: This thread is about middle aged men with their reckons.

 



 

Not just this thread.





“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #2763970 20-Aug-2021 19:17
Send private message

Dingbatt:

 

Handle9: This thread is about middle aged men with their reckons.

 

 


Not just this thread.

 

 

Hah - I'm not from the middle ages.

 

If you two want to have a stupid young man p*ssing contest trying to work out who can come up with the dumbest stereotype, I'm fine with that.

 

 


driller2000
936 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 374

ID Verified

  #2763973 20-Aug-2021 19:29
Send private message

This is an interesting read:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_plants#Cost_overruns


gzt

gzt
18684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7824

Lifetime subscriber

  #2763977 20-Aug-2021 19:41
Send private message

The idea that nuclear generation is needed right now this minute in NZ because climate change is extremely silly and bizarre. Can you think of some better reasons please.

 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
networkn
Networkn
32864 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15454

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2763979 20-Aug-2021 19:45
Send private message

driller2000:

This is an interesting read:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_plants#Cost_overruns



If you didn't do anything because projects before of a similar nature cost more than expected then Noone should build houses, roads or convention centers, transport hubs and the list goes on forever

There are some valid reasons to not do nuclear power potentially but because it 'might' go over budget shouldn't be one of them.

gzt

gzt
18684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7824

Lifetime subscriber

  #2763985 20-Aug-2021 19:54
Send private message

hairy1: Building a Nuclear is quite a different proposition in New Zealand if you consider a Travelling Wave Reactor. I agree that building a Fukushima era Nuclear plant would be bananas. Travelling Wave Reactors are quite a different kettle of fish to those.

Building an entirely untested TWR would also be bananas if I'm not mistaken.

Handle9
11925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2763999 20-Aug-2021 20:22
Send private message

networkn:

There are some valid reasons to not do nuclear power potentially but because it 'might' go over budget shouldn't be one of them.

 

More correctly there are minimal reasons why nuclear power is attractive.


D1023319
527 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 90

ID Verified

  #2764111 21-Aug-2021 09:14
Send private message

This is a picture of NZ's power generation make up at ~ 8.50am this morning 

 

 

source : https://www.transpower.co.nz/power-system-live-data

 

 

 

With the green opposition to building more Dams (both for generation and water-supply) and for undertaking more gas exploration -  we are in for a major future supply issues as demand increases and gas production falls.

I have doubts the dream of solar will take up the gap as all people I know with roof solar seem to be averaging just under 40% network independence.
And I expect the greens will object to tidal flow/ under sea generation. 

 


Yes EV vehicles will increase battery storage allowing off peak generation of renewables to be stored but I don't see this negates the need to start building  significantly more generation now in advance of when we will need it.

 

 

 





 



1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.