Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
TeaLeaf

6436 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1241


  #2415537 10-Feb-2020 13:06
Send private message

freitasm:

 

DNS won't be more reliable on one or another. Neither voice/video conferencing systems.

 

 

My understanding is it retains the direct route, for work from home situations, so the network guys can use this IP through the DMZ and firewall for work from home situations.

Also gaming wise I thought hosting servers it was pretty much mandatory. But we dont host much anymore so thats no biggy.

Lastly the advantage of PI is its enemy, its less secure than a well set up Static IP..

 

Why did BP use to use Dynamic IP and now they dont at all?

So if the Mrs doesnt need a white listed IP you are saying it matters not Static VS Public?




TeaLeaf

6436 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1241


  #2415540 10-Feb-2020 13:15
Send private message

gehenna:

 

Nothing elitist about it.

 

 

No I meant the stormtrooper you are running, never mind, it was just a feeble attempt humor. ;-p

As you said, I could always ask for one later.

When BP moved from Dynamic to Public I thought the main issue is that Public is much less secure?

If the IP only changes on Reboot Im sure she could easily just give the network guys at work a new address without too much fuss.

Aside from security, Video conferencing or any service has no degradation? Why does avast say voip and video are more reliable on static? (advantages of static)

https://www.avast.com/c-static-vs-dynamic-ip-addresses

 

 

 

 


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41051

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2415543 10-Feb-2020 13:18
Send private message

TeaLeaf:

 

freitasm:

 

DNS won't be more reliable on one or another. Neither voice/video conferencing systems.

 

 

My understanding is it retains the direct route, for work from home situations, so the network guys can use this IP through the DMZ and firewall for work from home situations.

Also gaming wise I thought hosting servers it was pretty much mandatory. But we dont host much anymore so thats no biggy.

Lastly the advantage of PI is its enemy, its less secure than a well set up Static IP..

 

Why did BP use to use Dynamic IP and now they dont at all?

So if the Mrs doesnt need a white listed IP you are saying it matters not Static VS Public?

 

 

I think you're confusing Static IP vs Dynamic IP vs CGNAT IP.

 

Most Static IP is public anyway.

 

DNS doesn't care which type you are using, unless you are pointing a sub-domain to your home address.

 

Work from home doesn't require static addresses as most VPNs will go through on their outgoing connection (providing dynamic addresses don't change every five minutes, which does happen really) and most work these days can also be done on browser-based services.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 




gehenna
8667 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3883

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2415545 10-Feb-2020 13:19
Send private message

Static or dynamic are both as secure as each other.  It's not the IP you need to worry about, but what you're allowing in and out of your network through the IP.  So be more concerned about any ports that you're opening rather than what IP you have facing the world as it doesn't matter.

 

Is this the same Avast that is selling your personal information?  https://www.engadget.com/2020/01/27/avast-jumpshot-selling-user-data/

 

Yeah, no reason at all they'd want to convince customers to use static IP's....


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41051

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2415546 10-Feb-2020 13:19
Send private message

TeaLeaf:

 

When BP moved from Dynamic to Public I thought the main issue is that Public is much less secure?

If the IP only changes on Reboot Im sure she could easily just give the network guys at work a new address without too much fuss.

Aside from security, Video conferencing or any service has no degradation? Why does avast say voip and video are more reliable on static? (advantages of static)

https://www.avast.com/c-static-vs-dynamic-ip-addresses

 

 

Dynamic and Static addresses are public, unless the addresses are behind CGNAT.

 

I think there's a lot of confusion showing on in your statements.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


hio77
'That VDSL Cat'
13036 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3896

ID Verified
Trusted
Lizard Networks
Subscriber

  #2415547 10-Feb-2020 13:21
Send private message

TeaLeaf:

 

My understanding is it retains the direct route, for work from home situations, so the network guys can use this IP through the DMZ and firewall for work from home situations.

 

That's a major missuse of DMZ... shouldnt be required at all.





#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have. 


1 | 2 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.