Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
richms
29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10208

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #410964 30-Nov-2010 01:56
Send private message

The SDP isnt a demarc tho, they will install it anywhere on the internal wiring, totally negating any benifit of it. A demarc should be installed only where the telecom cable enters the premisis, preferably on the outside of the property.




Richard rich.ms



antoniosk
2382 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 742

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #410967 30-Nov-2010 05:38
Send private message

richms: The SDP isnt a demarc tho, they will install it anywhere on the internal wiring, totally negating any benifit of it. A demarc should be installed only where the telecom cable enters the premisis, preferably on the outside of the property.


Not quite.... the wiring guidelines are that the copper from Telecom goes into the SDP, and the SDP bridges into the premises wiring.

It's a physical break from the Telecom network.

The SDP doesn't HAVE to be where the old master socket is though.

For example, I have a master socket by the front door, and extensions in my office upstairs. I COULD move the SDP to the office and reticulate inside the house from there (in fact I prefer to)...

But the demarc is the SDP.





________

 

Antoniosk


Bung
6733 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2926

Subscriber

  #410977 30-Nov-2010 07:37
Send private message

Steve Biddle's blog posting on the SDP showed it apparently reusing existing (dodgy?) internal cable to locate inside the house but his diagrams include an ETP. AFAIK an ETP is the demarcation if it is fitted. How can "network" wiring coexist in the customer's cabling?

It's the 1st time I've noticed that the SDP uses screw terminals for the telephone connections. That seems a step backwards as far as reliability goes.



cyril7
9073 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #410980 30-Nov-2010 07:48
Send private message

It was a chorus decision to use screw terminals but that does not preclude the installer using Scotch locs to termiate the line. And yes the sdp is intended as the demarc, withh a clean line installed to the ETP.

Cyril

sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #410983 30-Nov-2010 07:55
Send private message

Bung:
It's the 1st time I've noticed that the SDP uses screw terminals for the telephone connections. That seems a step backwards as far as reliability goes.


I was surprised they had gone for screw terminals as well. Even though designed for use indoors and we only need to look at the corrosion that occurs in older BT jacks in NZ's damp houses to realise that exposed copper is a bad thing. Scotch lok connectors are probably a preferable option.

It would have been far more logical to include a punchdown terminal block like the Signet ST2206 that cyril7 designed.

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.