Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1253125 8-Mar-2015 07:51
Send private message

Jase2985:
KiwiNZ: I would not reward extortion, I would get a professional to try an recover my drive and if that was not successful mark it up to lesson learnt for not taking precautions or back up etc.


so you would essentually pay someone more to try and recover something that is essentially unrecoverable, just to avoid paying the ransom. sounds logical.

if you would be happy loosing years of family photos, thats your choice, but for most thats not really an option



No I use prevention, insurance(back up), safety first best practices. If this scenario occurred I would have a suitably skilled associate attemp recovery. Is that logical?




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.




nakedmolerat
4631 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 874

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1253126 8-Mar-2015 07:55
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
Jase2985:
KiwiNZ: I would not reward extortion, I would get a professional to try an recover my drive and if that was not successful mark it up to lesson learnt for not taking precautions or back up etc.


so you would essentually pay someone more to try and recover something that is essentially unrecoverable, just to avoid paying the ransom. sounds logical.

if you would be happy loosing years of family photos, thats your choice, but for most thats not really an option



No I use prevention, insurance(back up), safety first best practices. If this scenario occurred I would have a suitably skilled associate attemp recovery. Is that logical?


And the chance of this 'skilled' associate breaking the encryption In the next 50 years? Almost 0%?

In movie it is achievable within 10 secs.

MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1253133 8-Mar-2015 08:08
Send private message

nakedmolerat:
KiwiNZ:
Jase2985:
KiwiNZ: I would not reward extortion, I would get a professional to try an recover my drive and if that was not successful mark it up to lesson learnt for not taking precautions or back up etc.


so you would essentually pay someone more to try and recover something that is essentially unrecoverable, just to avoid paying the ransom. sounds logical.

if you would be happy loosing years of family photos, thats your choice, but for most thats not really an option



No I use prevention, insurance(back up), safety first best practices. If this scenario occurred I would have a suitably skilled associate attemp recovery. Is that logical?


And the chance of this 'skilled' associate breaking the encryption In the next 50 years? Almost 0%?

In movie it is achievable within 10 secs.


And that is why I said "attempt" recovery" I did not come down in the last shower.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.