sir1963:
Handle9:
You still have to setup, configure and keep updated HomeKit devices. My thermostats are HomeKit enabled but they still require all of that.
It sounds like home automation isn’t for you at all.
ATM I agree HA may not be for me.... but it should be.
I want something that just works, has one front end, is easy to configure for non geeks.
Everyone is looking for lock-in, ad revenue, phone home, tracking, proprietary tech etc in the INMO of being bought out for insane sums by one of the big players.
Yes there is open stuff, but too much of that is by geeks for geeks. Too much tech is still at the "program the VCR" level of consumer usability.
I have a lot of tech at home that I regularly do SW updates on, and some I don't bother with (eg "smart" TVs, I have Apple TVs).
It should be considered part of the house, ie in 20 years time you can still get new parts for it from multiple suppliers. Why spend a huge sum of money on something you will need to replace every 10 years (or less). The motion detectors for my house are about 20 years old, and I have had to replace some of them with something that just works in their place, easy!
tech churn, planned obsolesce etc is NOT there for the consumers benefit, its for the benefit of those who get to sell you new stuff time and time again, adding to the waste stream.
The advantage of HA (and others like it eg openhab), it they dont tie you to one ecosystem. And while they will have a higher time cost, once it's up you are more insulated.
And then you can choose what (or all) to expose to homekit for a simpler WAF interface. While also having the option of a interface if needed.
I mean being able to create a Stereo on homekit (which is not a device type), exposed as a tv, which when you tell it to power on, is actually firing a IR code at my very dumb receiver, and then tell it to switch to the CD input - where the chromecast lives. Is not just possible with apple products natively. And I'd be having to buy an Airplay compatible device.


