JimmyC:RustyGonad:
Anything else you want to take out of context??? Other than that I'm not sure you even had a point...
I just don't see any comparison between a device which wouldn't turn on, or would crash after a couple of minutes, to the iPhone 4 which for all intents and purposes works just fine. My only point fwiw is that in terms of defectiveness your chosen examples are poles apart.
I wasn't comparing the device(s) at all. I was comparing the business process around both events, for which there are a number of similarities:
- design flaw
- personnel exodus as a direct result
- limited public admission of liability or guilt
- redesign which will has little/no impact on the device spec, but protects against future liability/risk.
Business liability and risk mitigation considers a whole lot more factors than someone on Geekzone called Jimmy thinking that the iPhone 4 "for all intents and purposes works just fine."
Having a fundamental flaw in the primary purpose (its not called a iPHONE for nothing) of your device poses a pretty considerable business risk. If it didn't you would not be getting a free bumper. Actions always speak louder than words, especially when coming from Apple.
While you may see gadgets and a punter on the end, most of this stuff is driven by business process.
You have an opinion that the iPhone 4 has no design issue - Apple and a few million other people tend to disagree with you... Only one is right. And thats all I've got to add on this subject...


