Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Beccara
1473 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 517

ID Verified

  #434260 2-Feb-2011 13:26
Send private message

Interleaving is error correction isn't it? I'm surprised they would let you turn it off



wjw

wjw
174 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  #434273 2-Feb-2011 13:55
Send private message

markpetrie: oh and WJW - does this mean you are happy to cancel that special cable connection you happen to have at your house:) you would need to work out routing your native IPv6 allocation to it too!


Need to get cabinetised first...

Beccara: Interleaving is error correction isn't it? I'm surprised they would let you turn it off


Many moons ago I setup VDSL at a ski field in Cadrona,  the amount of interferance between the 12 subs I had caused the speed to drop considerably when interleaving was turned off.

juha
1317 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7

Trusted

  #434296 2-Feb-2011 14:59
Send private message

Beccara: Interleaving is error correction isn't it? I'm surprised they would let you turn it off


I'm curious too why it's not optional, when it is on ADSL2+. VDSL2 won't ever be delivered from distances over 6-700 metres... is interleaving still necessary, if the line is good? 






wjw

wjw
174 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  #434302 2-Feb-2011 15:06
Send private message

juha:
Beccara: Interleaving is error correction isn't it? I'm surprised they would let you turn it off


I'm curious too why it's not optional, when it is on ADSL2+. VDSL2 won't ever be delivered from distances over 6-700 metres... is interleaving still necessary, if the line is good? 


Probably, in the instance I was talking about, the copper only shared the same conduit for the first 1000m then split. 

cyril7
9073 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #435669 5-Feb-2011 15:14
Send private message

Hi, older VDSL (not VDSL2) modulation was not very compatible with ADLS2 carriers in the same wrapper. Basically VDSL1 was not aligned with ADSL and the Power density profiles that allowed good compatibility with ADSL. VDSL2 on the other hand is quite harmonious, relatively speaking.


Cyril

Edit, oh Nick good blog, great to see VDSL2 come out in the light of day.

Mark any news on what the public release will be.

markp
23 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted
Snap Internet

  #435695 5-Feb-2011 17:09
Send private message

Hi Cyril

I would have to completely agree with you there, from our trial's where we have had a few VDSL2+ lines off the same DSLAM and cable pair we have not noticed any issues (although to be fair we have not really looked at this in great depth) if anything the option to allow interleave off would have been good. - especially as most of the lines running VDSL will be on short copper runs and are unlikely to benefit from interleaving - there is some interesting info on interleaving on the commerce commission's website here http://www.comcom.govt.nz/media-releases/detail/2009/averagebroadbandperformancecontinu


In terms of a public release we are still a good few months away, the Telecom Wholesale service is still in soft launch, so we won’t be launching it until it is in full production. (hopefully this saves some calls to our helpdesk!)

Mark

 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).
Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #436097 7-Feb-2011 02:04
Send private message

You can see why they might not want to have an interleaving off option to begin with in the trial/pilot.

However, surely it's just a profile setting on the line cards in the ISAM? It's well known that the IKANOS line cards in the ISAM's do VDSL2 and ASDL2+, interleaving off is available for ADSL2+ plans so it would be madness to not allow it for VDSL2 from the very same line card.... unless there is a technical reason for it?


scensation
63 posts

Master Geek


  #436241 7-Feb-2011 12:38
Send private message

Thanks for posting the results, Nick.

The speednet test results are similar to what I got with TelstraClear's 15/2 cable, while the upload speeds are only slightly better than what I am getting with Slingshot ADSL2+ right now. Mind you though, Slingshot's performance today is actually better than what it has been for the past few days.

I have high regards for Snap and had high hopes for VDSL2+, and was even more excited with the combination of the two. These results dampen my enthusiasm somehow.

Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #436250 7-Feb-2011 12:48
Send private message

Just noticed 12dB noise margin in the screenshot same as ASDL. Telecom are too conservative with these settings, 9dB and 6dB are common overseas and in LLU gear for ADSL here... which allows higher sync rates.

It's a seems a shame to limit everyone's max sync sped by having a conservative noise margin because some lines are bad.

markp
23 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted
Snap Internet

#436331 7-Feb-2011 15:20
Send private message

scensation: Thanks for posting the results, Nick.

The speednet test results are similar to what I got with TelstraClear's 15/2 cable, while the upload speeds are only slightly better than what I am getting with Slingshot ADSL2+ right now. Mind you though, Slingshot's performance today is actually better than what it has been for the past few days.

I have high regards for Snap and had high hopes for VDSL2+, and was even more excited with the combination of the two. These results dampen my enthusiasm somehow.

 
I'm slightly confused, Nik's results show a upload sync of 9Mbit with an attainable sync speed of 29Mbit - which would be substantially faster than the 2Mbit on HFC or ADSL2+? - even the download speeds far exceed 15Mbit on cable or what is achievable on ADSL2+ - are you sure you are looking at the right speedtests on Niks page?

scensation
63 posts

Master Geek


  #436344 7-Feb-2011 15:50
Send private message

These are my latest results. Obviously, TCL cable would have been better.

 (Nicks: 8.38/5.16)

 (Nicks: 7.03/2.49)

 (Nicks: 4.78/1.85)

 (Nicks: 2.62/0.96)

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #436792 8-Feb-2011 12:58
Send private message

Not surprised to see speedtest results on Slingshot (especially internationally) that are lower than sync rates, and of course DSL sync rate depends on line conditions/distance/quality etc.

Anyway bask to VDSL2....

Good to see Snap piloting it.

Why isn't Telecom retail offering a pilot of this Telecom wholesale service yet, staff only atmj?

Where are Xnet and Maxnet they are usually early adopters aren't they?  Wasn't Orcon taking some volunteers a few months back from GZ too.


lokeynz
106 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16


  #437214 9-Feb-2011 12:14
Send private message

Switched over to the VDSL2 trial yesterday afternoon
Bandwidth (Down/Up - kbit/s):            51280/10350
The extra upload speed really helps to keep latency stable for VOIP
This graph shows latency to our VOIP provider, the cutover to interleaved VDSL2 shows the overall ping time going up but it can now keep stable through periods of heavy upload usage.



Mark: Are all connections set to profile 8b by default? Does the line just need to meet certain criteria to be changed to 17a or will it be sold as an optional upgrade?

networkn
Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #437223 9-Feb-2011 12:32
Send private message

I am curious to know (Nick your blog is down), why Nick would only be getting 8Mbit down, as I am on ADSL2+ and getting 12Mbit down already. I would have thought that unless he was only getting really slow speeds before that his down speed would be better (Up speeds look awesome).

lokeynz
106 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16


  #437230 9-Feb-2011 12:43
Send private message

I don't know whether it's single thread vs multi thread - my international on speedtest.net is also ~8mbps but a well seeded torrent can happily put through 40mbps with international peers.
Local speedtests aren't far off line speed.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.