Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


scuwp

3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


#107439 11-Aug-2012 20:20
Send private message

Removing old analogue aerial, and also helping a mate sort out TV at his new place.

Past installs have always included a diplexer.  If the only aerial installed is a UHF (Freeview terrestrial) which then goes straight into the distribution box, or straight to the TV, do you still need a diplexer or perhaps something else now?

Not actually sure what the diplexer did, only that one was necessary.  Is that still the case?   

 
Thanks 





Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



Create new topic
grant_k
3539 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 124

Trusted

  #671174 11-Aug-2012 20:51
Send private message

The diplexer would have been to combine VHF and UHF aerials, and perhaps split off a feed for FM to a receiver of some sort. With the demise of VHF aerials, all of that is redundant. If your mate still wants an FM aerial, it is better to run a separate aerial with its own coax for that.







oxnsox
1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 138


  #671175 11-Aug-2012 20:55
Send private message

Diplexer is a way of getting 2 aerials (signals) into one cable without them being aware of each other. Stops the signal from one effectively going up the other instead of down to the tele.
You should be able to safely remove it without affecting you signal

scuwp

3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


  #671176 11-Aug-2012 20:59
Send private message

Great stuff, that makes things a bit easier. Thanks

Would the signal actually improve without the diplexer?





Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation





Jaxson
8172 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1332

Trusted

  #671178 11-Aug-2012 21:00
Send private message

There are potential signal level losses by keeping it in the system too, so remove if you can.

scuwp

3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


  #671181 11-Aug-2012 21:06
Send private message

Great, thanks for the clarification.




Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



PimpMyMagic
267 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  #671242 11-Aug-2012 23:32
Send private message

UHF, being much higher frequencies, tend to suffer greater signal loss in cables so it was common to use a diplexer which included a mast head amplifier. Removing this could reduce your UHF signal strength on the output of the aerial cable.
This setup will normally be indicated by the presence of a small power injector box, usually fed with volts from a plug pack.

As long as this is not present then all the foregoing advice will apply.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.