Samsung Galaxy S IV Discussion and Owners Thread

Forums › Android › Samsung Galaxy S IV Discussion and Owners Thread

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 111

2225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 373

#778710 12-Mar-2013 17:42

networkn:
Kopkiwi: If Samsung go the cheap plastic construction again, I won't be getting it. Have put up with it for a year now because it's been the best on the market but with Sony and HTC releasing great phones recently and the Motorola Google X hopefully living up to the rumors I won't be buying the crap build of Samsung if it isn't improved.

Wow that's a pretty strong reaction. I use my phone all the time, and I don't see a single sign of wear or tear on it anywhere.

One thing I'd be keen to now is if anyone knows if the burn in issue with the s3 is warranty?

I couldn't understand the hatred toward the S3's plastics when it was released, but having since migrated to a Nokia 920 the S3 definitely feels flimsier by comparison. I have a Samsung tablet also and while it performs well the feel of it is very similar to the S3, creaky low cost plastic

jeffnz

2870 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 666

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#778724 12-Mar-2013 18:05

interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

Galaxy S10

Garmin Fenix 5

kiwitrc

4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user

#778726 12-Mar-2013 18:07

Yeah I am all about performance rather than aesthetics, radio hates metal so the less metal that's in it the better as far as I am concerned.

networkn

Networkn
32863 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#778731 12-Mar-2013 18:27

jeffnz: interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

Yep this never ceases to amaze me. I wonder what the price of it would have been if it hadn't been plastic.

Kopkiwi

2617 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 258
Inactive user

#778747 12-Mar-2013 18:59

jeffnz: interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

Looks? I didn't mention looks. Just give me a quality made product that doesn't feel cheap.

Not that hard. HTC, Sony and Motorola have all managed it.

Wade

2225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 373

#778753 12-Mar-2013 19:15

jeffnz: interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

if that comment is pointed at me then you would be putting words in my mouth, I do not rate aesthetics above performance at all, every device has its own merit, take a step back though and compare the S3 with its peers purely on a look and feel basis, it is not a class leader by a longshot

Dyson

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).

networkn

Networkn
32863 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#778755 12-Mar-2013 19:20

Kopkiwi:
jeffnz: interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

Looks? I didn't mention looks. Just give me a quality made product that doesn't feel cheap.

Not that hard. HTC, Sony and Motorola have all managed it.

You have just mentioned three companies who are struggling to even exist in the smartphone market. Two of those companies will be lucky to survive at all in their current market.

Considering the amazing popularity of the S range of Galaxy phones, I think you are a minority.

Damager

2125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 37

#778782 12-Mar-2013 20:16

networkn:
Kopkiwi: If Samsung go the cheap plastic construction again, I won't be getting it. Have put up with it for a year now because it's been the best on the market but with Sony and HTC releasing great phones recently and the Motorola Google X hopefully living up to the rumors I won't be buying the crap build of Samsung if it isn't improved.

Wow that's a pretty strong reaction. I use my phone all the time, and I don't see a single sign of wear or tear on it anywhere.

One thing I'd be keen to now is if anyone knows if the burn in issue with the s3 is warranty?

Mine's been on 24/7 for about 8 months and it still looks new. The haterade on the build is over the top.

- Telstra HTC Touch Pro2 - Energy ROM WM6.5.5 20 Oct/Cyanogen Mod Froyo 2.2 - R.I.P
- AT&T Galaxy S Captivate 16GB on XT (now with brother)
- Samsung Galaxy S2 on XT- Runs ICS 4.0.3 Resurrection Remix 9.2
- Business Hours - Work In The Electricity Industry, After Hours - DJ/Turntablist - Will Scratch Vinyl For Free'
- What's next??? S3?

Kopkiwi

2617 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 258
Inactive user

#778789 12-Mar-2013 20:39

networkn:
Kopkiwi:
jeffnz: interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

Looks? I didn't mention looks. Just give me a quality made product that doesn't feel cheap.

Not that hard. HTC, Sony and Motorola have all managed it.

You have just mentioned three companies who are struggling to even exist in the smartphone market. Two of those companies will be lucky to survive at all in their current market.

Considering the amazing popularity of the S range of Galaxy phones, I think you are a minority.

Their status has absolutely sweet FA to do with the fact they make better built phone.

Yes Samsung do the better software, but their build quality is right at the bottom.

networkn

Networkn
32863 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#778790 12-Mar-2013 20:44

Kopkiwi:
networkn:
Kopkiwi:
jeffnz: interesting how some rate looks and feel above hardware and functionality, maybe Nokia and Apple are onto winners.

Looks? I didn't mention looks. Just give me a quality made product that doesn't feel cheap.

Not that hard. HTC, Sony and Motorola have all managed it.

You have just mentioned three companies who are struggling to even exist in the smartphone market. Two of those companies will be lucky to survive at all in their current market.

Considering the amazing popularity of the S range of Galaxy phones, I think you are a minority.

Their status has absolutely sweet FA to do with the fact they make better built phone.

Yes Samsung do the better software, but their build quality is right at the bottom.

Well having owned at LEAST 45 Phones in my life, I can simply say that isn't my experience either. I have had 2 faults with my s3, both wireless, but I've owned at least 10 Samsung phones and it's the first fault I've ever had with them and their warranty support was flawless.

It's not the best feeling phone in the world, but the only time I ever notice it is when these discussions pop up. Considering that it's unmarked with the lifestyle I lead, I'd buy another in a heart beat made of this material.

P1n3apqlExpr3ss

853 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 31

#778795 12-Mar-2013 20:58

The build quality is pretty good; it's the build materials that are questionable. That cheap looking glossy back is a big cause of this

Quic Broadband

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.

jeffnz

2870 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 666

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#778798 12-Mar-2013 21:06

I agree i think the quality is right up there and can't see how anyone can say its below Motorola but each to their own.

I don't like the colours or the glossy back but never bought it for how well it looks, besides I have it in a case like most folks so don't see it as a problem.

As an aside I wouldn't exactly say HTC build quality works that well since they can't even get battery life sorted.

Galaxy S10

Garmin Fenix 5

networkn

Networkn
32863 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#778882 12-Mar-2013 23:40

http://bgr.com/2013/03/11/samsung-galaxy-s-iv-photos-leak-367985/?utm_source=featuredposts-widget-main&utm_medium=home

These look pretty legit. I wouldn't be surprised if that was it, though I am a little sad as I don't love it too much!

Damager

2125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 37

#778883 12-Mar-2013 23:42

And the matching video released not long ago. Seems legit but hope it's not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfzom-RdrwI&list=LLMFDe7o8p1fuSroOG8s97OQ&feature=mh_lolz

NZtechfreak

4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 461

Trusted

#778887 13-Mar-2013 00:01

Looks like 2600mA battery confirmed too.

I note the camera module footprint and bump are quite large, hoping that means a credible increase in sensor size.

I also note all the backgrounds in settings are white, ? no AMOLED. That could be a regional variation though, they've done that before.

Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 111