Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Using Bluetooth Headset for Speech Recognition with Windows Mobile: Or Not
Posted on 4-Feb-2006 08:57 by M Freitas | Tags Filed under: Blog



You tried some of the registry hacks floating around to use Bluetooth headsets with Pocket PCs and it didn't work well? Over at the Windows Mobile Team Blog, Mike Calligaro explains why Voice Command doesn't work over Bluetooth (BTh) headsets:

"The short story is that the current version of Voice Command relies on microphones that sample at 16 kHz, but BTh headsets only do 8kHz.".

But the real explanation comes down in the blog post. The whole thing comes down to assumptions made by developers when planning software that will take a long time to be written. Decisions have to be made, and sometimes they branch our to the wrong path.

Apparently "the Voice Command team. [They] set out to make the best voice recognition software they could. And, their original analysis said that they could do much better recognition if they designed their database around the assumption that audio would be sampled at 16 kHz instead of 8.

At this point in history, BTh's future was murky. Although it had strong backers, it wasn't doing very well. There were people who promised that it would align the planets, create spiritual harmony, and bring about world peace. There were others who felt that it was a flash in the pan that wouldn't go anywhere. And there were a million more opinions that covered pretty much everything in between. Publicly, Microsoft was pretty cold on BTh at the start, though a number of people in the company were strong proponents.

So the Voice Command team had a tough decision to make. Should they assume BTh would continue to flounder and write a better recognizer that relied on built in microphones (which can sample at 16 kHz)? Or should they assume BTh would take off and everyone would want to do Voice Command over BTh headsets?

They decided that BTh would succeed, but that it was going to take a while to do it. So they chose to go with the better recognizer first. Then BTh took off more quickly than they expected
.

There are much more on the post, worth reading it. It does sound as a mea culpa, which is good - but there is no guarantees this kind of decision or assumption won't happen in the future. But every long project needs decisions taken sooner than later so it's understandable.










comments powered by Disqus


Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Vodafone TV - Is this sky?
Created by wingbat45, last reply by Yabanize on 19-Oct-2017 23:46 (78 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Chorus Fibre install
Created by MikeB4, last reply by kryptonjohn on 19-Oct-2017 14:24 (18 replies)
Pages... 2


Obesity in NZ - OECD
Created by Fred99, last reply by gzt on 18-Oct-2017 16:36 (124 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


Windows 10 Fall Creators Update
Created by DjShadow, last reply by DjShadow on 19-Oct-2017 20:35 (31 replies)
Pages... 2 3


KRACK - WPA2 essentially cracked.
Created by michaelmurfy, last reply by redgamer on 20-Oct-2017 02:21 (74 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Under -deck "roofing"
Created by kryptonjohn, last reply by blakamin on 19-Oct-2017 22:00 (42 replies)
Pages... 2 3


BBQ season is approaching again and I need a new one.
Created by gished, last reply by dickytim on 20-Oct-2017 05:55 (50 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


BlueBourne - CGA Claim advice
Created by vyfster, last reply by Aredwood on 19-Oct-2017 09:34 (122 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9