Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1598 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


Topic # 62984 18-Jun-2010 14:23
Send private message

Just saw this: http://www.throng.co.nz/fifa-world-cup/sky-asked-provide-3d-coverage-rugby-world-cup

"Sky Television has been asked by the International Rugby Board (IRB) to offer 3D coverage of next year’s Rugby World Cup to international broadcasters.

//

Sky’s host broadcaster contract is likely to be extended in order to cover what the IRB sees as a demand for 3D in international markets.

The technology will not be available to New Zealand viewers however, with standard HD coverage in store for us here due to the expense and limited audience in this country.

As host broadcaster, Sky is in charge of sending out high-definition coverage to international broadcasters as well as providing commentary and other material.

Should the 3D coverage be greenlit, extra cameras and staff would need to be sourced in order to provide it, which would need to be assessed in terms of cost by the IRB.

But the question remains as to whether there is a big enough market worldwide for the 3D coverage with rugby’s potential audience relatively small in the likes of Europe and the US. If it’s only the UK who want 3D pictures then the cost to the BBC and BSky B would be very high.

With the current Football World Cup breaking new ground in terms of global 3D sporting coverage, are the IRB and international broadcasters getting too carried in looking at the Rugby World Cup as a 3D goldmine when its global appeal is significantly smaller than that of football?

Source: NZ Herald"

Create new topic
513 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted
Kiwi Dev Studios

  Reply # 343030 18-Jun-2010 14:41
Send private message

all I can say is wow.. 3D live sports.. that would be awesome!




--
Stephen
twitter/ NZCoderGuy / KiwiDevStudios

Kiwi Dev Studios


1748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 361

Trusted

  Reply # 343798 21-Jun-2010 15:36
Send private message




My thoughts are no longer my own and is probably representative of our media-controlled government


 
 
 
 


DS9

268 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 343801 21-Jun-2010 15:43
Send private message

SepticSceptic: Ta Da !!!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10653298&ref=rss


Sky NZ still has to buy equipment and then film and broadcast 3D for the rugby world cup, I would prefer 3D to be available already at home though as the Footbal World Cup is already be broadcast in it.

7912 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 801

Subscriber

  Reply # 343803 21-Jun-2010 15:50
Send private message

I may yo go to the movies and watch something like the simi and final if we're in it. But will they be in day time or the cold evening hours for the Poms benefits..




Regards,

Old3eyes


1748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 361

Trusted

  Reply # 343813 21-Jun-2010 16:19
Send private message

DS9:
SepticSceptic: Ta Da !!!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10653298&ref=rss


Sky NZ still has to buy equipment and then film and broadcast 3D for the rugby world cup, I would prefer 3D to be available already at home though as the Footbal World Cup is already be broadcast in it.



As the article mentioned, it's not Sky providing the 3D content. It's via a 3rd party.


"An Auckland based production company - 3D Live - has confirmed it is seeking the rights to film the Cup in 3D alongside Sky, with British and Australian partners Can Communications and Ignition"

I would tend to agree with Fellet, there is not enough 3D TV sets in NZ to justify 3D transmission. No doubt he would be looking with keen interest at the turnout at both the Soccer and WRC2011 3D cinema attendance ,,,,, if bugger all attendance, then there will be no 3D for a long time ...






My thoughts are no longer my own and is probably representative of our media-controlled government


DS9

268 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 343819 21-Jun-2010 16:40
Send private message

SepticSceptic:
DS9:
SepticSceptic: Ta Da !!!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10653298&ref=rss


Sky NZ still has to buy equipment and then film and broadcast 3D for the rugby world cup, I would prefer 3D to be available already at home though as the Footbal World Cup is already be broadcast in it.



As the article mentioned, it's not Sky providing the 3D content. It's via a 3rd party.


"An Auckland based production company - 3D Live - has confirmed it is seeking the rights to film the Cup in 3D alongside Sky, with British and Australian partners Can Communications and Ignition"

I would tend to agree with Fellet, there is not enough 3D TV sets in NZ to justify 3D transmission. No doubt he would be looking with keen interest at the turnout at both the Soccer and WRC2011 3D cinema attendance ,,,,, if bugger all attendance, then there will be no 3D for a long time ...




If there is money to be made, Sky NZ will do it.

1586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 156

Trusted

  Reply # 344666 23-Jun-2010 20:10
Send private message

SepticSceptic:
I would tend to agree with Fellet, there is not enough 3D TV sets in NZ to justify 3D transmission.


But until there is content there won't be enough sets. And there wont be enough content until there are enough sets.

Anyone else see a problem here?




CPU: Intel 3770k| RAM: F3-2400C10D-16GTX G.Skill Trident X |MB:  Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H-WB | GFX: GV-N660OC-2GD gv-n660oc-2gd GeForce GTX 660 | Monitor: Qnix 27" 2560x1440

 

 


1748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 361

Trusted

  Reply # 344786 24-Jun-2010 09:59
Send private message

mentalinc:
SepticSceptic:
I would tend to agree with Fellet, there is not enough 3D TV sets in NZ to justify 3D transmission.


But until there is content there won't be enough sets. And there wont be enough content until there are enough sets.

Anyone else see a problem here?


The old adage, "build it and they will come" ?

3D TV will arrive. However there are a couple of points to ponder ....

1) Standards - Although the transmission technology has been pretty much sorted, the viewing tech hasn't - each TV manufacturer offers their own type of 3D viewing mechanism, and not much compatibility between them. It's the old VHS-Beta / HD-DVD-Blu-Ray debacle, and people don't want to be holding a technology that becomes obsolescent at the stroke of a pen.

2) Many people have recently invested in a large screen, and upgrading to another large screen won't be on many peoples budget for the next few years.

Wouldn't be surprised if a few manufacturers bring out some kind of "black box" that allows a standard large screen to view some kind of pseudo 3D, albeit with a slightly reduced resolution as compared with a dedicated 3D screen.




My thoughts are no longer my own and is probably representative of our media-controlled government


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.