What I shot today

Forums › Digital Imaging › What I shot today

1 | ... | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | ... | 36

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39

#993783 25-Feb-2014 01:38

More of a "What I shot this week";

Jaxson

8172 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1332

Trusted

#993894 25-Feb-2014 09:50

Cool, what camera and lens combo were the 2nd and 3rd shots above with please?
Did you use a flash?

RileyB

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39

#994223 25-Feb-2014 16:07

Bottom two would be 6D and canon 24-70 f2.8 50% or so of the shots where shot at 6400-12800 ISO.

MaxLV

656 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 161

#999818 5-Mar-2014 21:08

ITAP (What I shot this month)

Feral kitten (one of five) living in my back yard:

Try out of my new Sony E mount 55-210mm telephoto lense for my Nex7.

DOF is very small/narrow, cant decide if it detracts or enhances the photos.

Shot from about 4 metres away.

Jaxson

8172 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1332

Trusted

#999849 5-Mar-2014 21:52

RileyB: Bottom two would be 6D and canon 24-70 f2.8 50% or so of the shots where shot at 6400-12800 ISO.

Thanks, what about the crowd shot of the girls, the one under the guitar player?

RileyB

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39

#999919 6-Mar-2014 02:28

Canon 24-70 F2.8 @67mm 1/100 sec, f3.2 ISO6400

On flickr if you click and go into the image, then below the image is a button that says "Additional Info", clicking that will show all the settings/gear used to shot it.

Lenovo

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

Jaxson

8172 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1332

Trusted

#999935 6-Mar-2014 07:45

RileyB: Canon 24-70 F2.8 @67mm 1/100 sec, f3.2 ISO6400

On flickr if you click and go into the image, then below the image is a button that says "Additional Info", clicking that will show all the settings/gear used to shot it.

Thanks, I didn't notice they were linked

jarledb

Webhead
3319 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1983

Moderator

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1000426 6-Mar-2014 23:09

geocom: Taken me awhile to get these uploaded due to yahoo removing my flickr login but not my account. So not really what I shot today but anyway.

Taken with the sony a7r with a Sony 18-70mm lens. Taken with a really low ISO of 50(The a7r's 50 iso half's the megapixels) and a really slow shutter speed.

Very nice pictures and camera! How long exposure was those 50 ISO shots?

Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.

RileyB

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39

#1000448 7-Mar-2014 02:08

Very cool, reminds of the midwinter carnival down here in Dunedin. Just beware you also loose a stop of dynamic range when using ISO 50 as it's actually shooting at ISO 100 and de-amplifying the signal.

Jarledb, the top one is 13 seconds.

jarledb

Webhead
3319 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1983

Moderator

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1000678 7-Mar-2014 12:07

RileyB: Very cool, reminds of the midwinter carnival down here in Dunedin. Just beware you also loose a stop of dynamic range when using ISO 50 as it's actually shooting at ISO 100 and de-amplifying the signal.

Jarledb, the top one is 13 seconds.

A little embarrassed it didn't click that it was Flickr links. I know that I can look at the Exif info there.

geocom

597 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 143

Subscriber

#1000688 7-Mar-2014 12:18

RileyB: Very cool, reminds of the midwinter carnival down here in Dunedin. Just beware you also loose a stop of dynamic range when using ISO 50 as it's actually shooting at ISO 100 and de-amplifying the signal.

Jarledb, the top one is 13 seconds.

Yea if I was doing it again I would shoot at 100 ISO as only after I had it on my computer did I realise what ISO 50 was doing, and it is not like you cannot replicate it later in post.

Just glad I did not use my wide angle as with the cropping needed to remove the Vignetting the resolution would have not been much better than my old a200.

Geoff E