![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Geektastic: I'm not sure why that should be a great surprise!
Geektastic: I'm not sure why that should be a great surprise!
Fred99:Geektastic: I'm not sure why that should be a great surprise!
I could see the difference. My pick for best was the D810. It captured shadow detail / tonality better, even with what I assume was an ex-camera jpeg without post-processing.
RileyB: Would agree I would be unlikely to spot the difference without going 1:1
I'd go Canon just on the basis of having the best lens and flashes, and being the only brand to make an 70-200 2.8
joker97: But low ISO sensor noise ... there is no competition - Nikon (Sony).
CRAZY High ISO sensor noise .... well .. who cares ;p
RileyB: From what I've heard the 100-400 ii is supposed to be damn good, but not on par with the 70-200's and such. I ended up going with 400 5.6 as don't see the point in a zoom lens that I'll only ever use at 400mm :P
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |