Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

Mad Scientist
17926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2230

Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 57466 14-Feb-2010 20:20
Send private message

I am an amateur novice budget photographer.
Using Canon 400D

I have googled and it seems to say
1) the sigma has better build but is heavier
2) the sigma has lower chromatic abberation and barrel distortion


3) the canon is sharper

can anyone confirm the above?

oh dear!

i think it all comes down to the image stabilisation question
- the sigma takes one second to image stabilize
- how long does the canon take???

both are $700+ on

Create new topic
1481 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  Reply # 299113 15-Feb-2010 15:28
Send private message

Have you checked

Both lens are reviewed there, both are recommended with reservations.

I think in this price bracket there are always compromises to be made with long zooms.

What about the 70-200 F4L? Unless you need the wide end or image stabilisation this would be a huge improvement over both of the lens you mentioned, maybe around $300 or so more but money well spent in my opinion.

Mad Scientist
17926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2230

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 299131 15-Feb-2010 15:57
Send private message

unfortunately wideangle is what i'm after. *sigh, why dont i just get a point and shoot fuji f70! the good lenses are at least 2x the price of my 400d!


1772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 116

  Reply # 299301 15-Feb-2010 21:27
Send private message is also a very good review site to peruse when looking for new glass.

From my experience with the Nikon equivalents sharpness can in most cases be fudged in post processing, but so can fixing of CA and distortion with less effort.

In reality the Sigma will probably cost less (without actually checking) and has a better/heavier build quality which would sell it for me.

A lens like that will end up being purchased as a jack of all trades so might be prone to a little more abuse than a less used piece of glass so build quality is a big deal.

I can't comment on the stabilization time but if you're taking a shot that needs it you've probably got more than a second to frame it and have everything ready but i don't know what you'll be using it for i guess.

Do you live near a camera store with them both in? Take your body down there and try them out. It's really the only way to get a full feel for the lens itself.

Mad Scientist
17926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2230

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 299313 15-Feb-2010 21:46
Send private message

i have decided on the sigma
- the barrel distortion is minimal (1.9%), whereas the canon has 4%, and i predominantly use the wide angle part
- in terms of pixel quality, even though the canon is superior, really we're talking about 2 hopeless piece of equipment for pixel, so "superior" is still crap. i can't afford the 17-55mm f/2.8 USM at just under 2 grand a pop! i'm saving up for a 5d mark 2 ... hopefully it'll get a clearance once the 'new' model (?mark 3??) comes out.
- it's a bit cheaper
- whatever it is hopefully it's a lot better than my non IS stock 18-55mm poo poo plastic

Mad Scientist
17926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2230

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 304246 4-Mar-2010 00:59
Send private message

so a run down on the sigma:

very front heavy now. zoom twist a bit stiff. lense hood loose-ish.
barrel distortion is complex at wide angle, but mild.

definitely sharper and focuses quicker/more accurately than my original lens
great shots possible (if i don't shake - even with image stabilization) due to the zoom
no need to change lenses between shots
great match for the humble 400D - both budget, both living happily ever after

great if you're not fussed! no complaints.

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:

News »

Stuff Pix enters streaming video market
Posted 21-Mar-2018 09:18

Windows no longer Microsoft’s main focus
Posted 13-Mar-2018 07:47

Why phone makers are obsessed with cameras
Posted 11-Mar-2018 12:25

New Zealand Adopts International Open Data Charter
Posted 3-Mar-2018 12:48

Shipments tumble as NZ phone upgrades slow
Posted 2-Mar-2018 11:48

Oppo R11s: high-end Android, budget price
Posted 27-Feb-2018 16:27

Samsung New Zealand introducing the Galaxy S9 and S9+
Posted 26-Feb-2018 07:00

Fujifilm X beats its best with new top of the range, high-performance camera
Posted 24-Feb-2018 14:05

One million kiwis affected by cybercrime
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:58

New Zealanders want to engage with government online and via mobile apps
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:56

Samsung launches Samsung Max
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:52

CPTPP text and National Interest Analysis released for public scrutiny
Posted 21-Feb-2018 19:43

Foodstuffs to trial digitised shopping trolleys
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:27

2018: The year of zero-login, smart cars & the biometrics of things
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:25

Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21

Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.