Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
mrdrifter
589 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 294

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1992794 10-Apr-2018 15:30
Send private message

neveR:

 

All 3 of these below are similar priced, and all look far better to me...

 

nztinyhomes.com 

 

 

 

 

I've actually had a good look in and around their demo model in person. It's well put together with a few things that needed fixing and the team acknowledged that they have be improving the build/supply side to ensure quality was up there.

 

Overall I was impressed with the quality of the finished product.

 

I note that most of the comments above reflect on tiny houses being used for high density. I think as Mauricio mentioned, this is normally more about lifestyle and most tiny houses are probably more likely to be found in bigger less densely built up areas.




JimmyH
2898 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1554


  #1992800 10-Apr-2018 15:43
Send private message

Holy cow, those are minuscule. Even the three bedroom version is tiny. While the prices are good, I wouldn't contemplate them as a main dwelling, as I simply couldn't fit all of the stuff I have into them. Particularly my books, which require a lot of shelf space.

 

However, they look interesting and are something I would contemplate one as an affordable holiday batch, if I was so inclined and had the cash to spare. Which I'm not, and I don't. 


Lastman
312 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 107


  #1992807 10-Apr-2018 15:56
Send private message

I think they add well to the mix of accomodation. I like the resilience they potentially offer ie can be moved in response to natural disasters or climate change effects.

I’d like to see them blended in to the housing laws especially that they are not avoiding appropriate contributions to rates etc.



andrew027
1286 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 557


  #1992808 10-Apr-2018 15:57
Send private message

freitasm: Check this slideshow of tiny houses for an example. 

 

Some of the ones in that slideshow look great. I think my better half and I could easily live in some of these now that the kids have left home, but there would need to be some serious decluttering, and I think doing without everything that's not an absolute necessity is the key to making these things work. 

 

A couple of questions:

 

  • A lot of them seem to be built on trailers. Where do you draw the line between a "tiny home" and a caravan?
  • Do you think the Marshall guitar amplifier that appears to make up half of the right-hand wall on #3 actually works?

jarledb
Webhead
3319 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1983

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1992810 10-Apr-2018 15:59
Send private message

Small homes for sure. Not sure its for me, but I know some of those houses are very well built. And I would take a tiny house over a leaky, cold, old typical Kiwi house any day.

 

As a Norwegian I am really not impressed with most houses in New Zealand and how they are built. Most of them are built for a warmer climate than we have here in NZ.

 

Have some friends that have a family of 5 living in this tiny house.

 

Here are more photos of their tiny house





Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1992814 10-Apr-2018 16:03
Send private message

For singles and retired couples small/tiny houses make a lot of sense. Easier to maintain, cheaper and easier to heat. If the house has good access and the grounds are extension of the living room then I would be happy in one





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
wellygary
8810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5287


  #1992821 10-Apr-2018 16:11
Send private message

jarledb:

 

As a Norwegian I am really not impressed with most houses in New Zealand and how they are built. Most of them are built for a warmer climate than we have here in NZ.

 

 

NZ's biggest problem is that we build similar houses across the entire country, where the distance between Auckland and Invercargill is almost the same as from Vancouver to San Francisco.....


kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 953

Lifetime subscriber

  #1992824 10-Apr-2018 16:19
Send private message

Older houses (by NZ standards 50 years is an older house!) are the worst. Pulled the linings off our 1960's built house and there's obviously no insulation. And the wind was whistling through the gaps. No wonder these old houses never suffered from rot - too much ventilation of the cavities for that!

 

But in Auckland you certainly don't need the sort of build you'd see in northern USA, Canada or northern Europe. It's not that cold.

 

But how people live in Dunedin on those old villas - I don't know how they do it!

 

 


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19065 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16305

Lifetime subscriber

  #1992842 10-Apr-2018 16:29
Send private message

Sure beats living in a car. Or on a park bench. Maybe Labour will make their 100,000 homes after all.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


networkn
Networkn
32864 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15454

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1992844 10-Apr-2018 16:31
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Sure beats living in a car. Or on a park bench. Maybe Labour will make their 100,000 homes after all.

 

 

 

 

Twyford is in his office assembling dollhouses frantically right now actually. After all, Labour didn't specify houses for what, right? :) 

 

They won't meet the target of 100K because they already lowered it by 40% and are including houses NOT being built by them in this number!


MikeAqua
8024 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3818


  #1992850 10-Apr-2018 16:47
Send private message

I couldn't do it.  I spend most of the week in a well designed 35m (25m floor space) apartment.  I can only do that because I go to a proper house at the weekends.

 

 





Mike


 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1992853 10-Apr-2018 16:51
Send private message

These are not exactly tiny homes as such but they start as low as circa 50 sqm. They are built offsite and transported. I think the are a good idea.

 

 

 

http://matrixhomes.co.nz/





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Dulouz
887 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 384


  #1993086 11-Apr-2018 08:31
Send private message

They are fugly.





Amanon

mclean
584 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 182

Subscriber

  #1994229 11-Apr-2018 12:01
Send private message

Beccara: Even with Wheels some councils have some pretty interesting definitions, IIRC one even stated that as soon as they become stationary they become buildings subject to permits, Not 100% upto date on current feelings

 

The Building Act says it doesn't need a building consent if it's a "vehicle" and it's "movable".  The current MBIE determination on what this means says this more or less:  It's a "vehicle" if it has wheels, axle and a tow bar.  It's "movable" if it has no permanent service connections (like plumbing or drainage that would need a plumber to do).

 

As advertised, these units might not need a building consent as they're on trailers and don't seem to have power, water or drainage connections.


Behodar
11099 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6082

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1994246 11-Apr-2018 12:39
Send private message

networkn: Holy crap those are small. The 1 bedroom is somewhat smaller than my master bedroom and ensuite! I couldn't happily live in one of those.

 

My previous 1-bedroom unit was 54 m² and while it was livable it did feel a bit constrained. I wouldn't want to go back there... and certainly wouldn't want a tiny 34 m² place!

 

Edit: However, as a few others have pointed out, they could make decent baches.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.