Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


simon14

1889 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 44

Trusted

#182432 15-Oct-2015 15:45
Send private message

We have two 4 burner BBQ's with side burner. One from Bunnings and the other from The Warehouse. Both priced at $299:

http://www.bunnings.co.nz/jumbuck-4-burner-hooded-bbbq-with-side-burner-black-_p03170976

http://www.thewarehouse.co.nz/red/catalog/product/Necessities-Brand-BBQ-Genoa-Hood-4-Burner-with-Side-Burner?SKU=1981264

Jumbuck VS Necessities

In your opinion, what is the better contender?

Create new topic
ghettomaster
387 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 130


  #1407317 15-Oct-2015 15:57
Send private message

From a purely aesthetic point of view I think the Jumbuck looks better.



Zippity
683 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 132


  #1407343 15-Oct-2015 16:32
Send private message

Which one do you think is best?

ubergeeknz
3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

Trusted
Vocus

  #1407348 15-Oct-2015 16:48
Send private message

Go check them out in person IMO, you'll get a feel for which is better made



sudo
409 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  #1407435 15-Oct-2015 20:17
Send private message

yep check it out.

Last time I looked (about 3 years ago) they both were pretty poor qual, but the Jumbuck was slightly better made.
I ended up getting the Jumbuck.
The burner was stainless but the deflectors and bracketing were thin steel and rusted through after a couple years.

Get a proper fitting cover when you get it. The one I had tended to blow off in a storm accelerating the corrosion.

rosco62
55 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16

ID Verified

  #1410795 22-Oct-2015 07:52
Send private message

After having had a couple of these big sized bbq's i moved to a weber Q (gas) bbq a couple of years ago.  Although smaller than those you are looking at (Weber Q's come in 3 sizes) it is hands down the best BBQ i have used. Also it is portable so often take it away with us. also a good dealer network and lots of matching accessories, rotissere, flat plates, fish racks etc available




RoscoP

 

content://com.android.chrome.FileProvider/images/screenshot/1624508074523327816049.jpg


jonathan18
7415 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2850

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1410823 22-Oct-2015 08:46
Send private message

rosco62: After having had a couple of these big sized bbq's i moved to a weber Q (gas) bbq a couple of years ago.  Although smaller than those you are looking at (Weber Q's come in 3 sizes) it is hands down the best BBQ i have used. Also it is portable so often take it away with us. also a good dealer network and lots of matching accessories, rotissere, flat plates, fish racks etc available


Yep, this quality/quantity discussion came up in another recent BBQ thread (http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=141&topicid=181177) - that thread was enough to convince me to move away from one of the big beasts, so we'll be purchasing one of the mid-sized Weber Qs for an Xmas present for ourselves (Q2200 or Q2000).

That said, they are more expensive - the OP is discussing BBQs for $300, whereas even the mid-sized Webers are around twice that (and that's before allowing for a stand!). Personally, I've been swayed by the argument to pay more upfront for the quality and to get a product that works better and lasts longer (this doesn't always hold true with all products!); I'm not comfortable with a culture that sees things as substantial as bbqs as disposable items that only need to last a season or two before being replaced. But often a budget is not that elastic to find twice as much money up-front...

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.