|
|
I've had 2 outlet valve assemblies replaced in 2 of the three toilets in our 10yo house this year. Plumber said they last 5-7 years, a common problem. Never had a leaking toilet in all the years before with siphon based ones.

Thanks for the link. Interesting article cos my Mrs has a leaky dual flush that the plumber has already tried and failed to fix once. I found it was as they say - failing to seal after a flush - and if you lift the cistern lid and give the mechanism a wiggle or a twist then it reseals properly.
I think Auckland's problem is a bit more fundamental than this - the population has grown a lot without corresponding upgrades to the infrastructure.
tripper1000:Thanks for the link. Interesting article cos my Mrs has a leaky dual flush that the plumber has already tried and failed to fix once.
Yup, that's our one too.
Have hooked some of the toilets up to rainwater tank. Not sure if the water saving makes economic sense but can feel better about it :)

tripper1000:
I think Auckland's problem is a bit more fundamental than this - the population has grown a lot without corresponding upgrades to the infrastructure.
This
A depressingly typical NZ Local Government problem:
Step 1: have a major corporatisation / amalgamation / outsource of a critical service / infrastructure
Step 2: Tell the new / restructured / outsource supplier that the first priority is to demonstrate how good the new arrangements are - and therefore how clever the politicians pushing for it are - by having lower charges for the service. This will be the Number One KPI for the CEO's salary / bonus.
Step 3: The new supplier cuts costs to the bone, particularly by deferring maintenance and development of the system - "sweating the assets". When the experienced professional staff start complaining about this, restructure them out of the business.
Step 4: Rates / charges for the service go down slightly or are kept constant in actual dollar terms. Policticians are pleased, senior executives take home fabulous salaries
A few years later, it all turns to custard, but the guilty parties are long retired or promoted out of the line of fire.
Suddenly, there's a need to claw back five or more years of nil rates rises that should have been 2% or 3% p.a.
Much screaming results.
|
|