Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


2610 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 604

Trusted

Topic # 193446 11-Mar-2016 11:55
Send private message

Apparently the Napster founder thinks that we should be paying USD $50 (approximately $75 at todays exchange rate) to watch new release movies at home.

Hopefully that price includes the overpriced popcorn and drink too. 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
12430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5832

Trusted

  Reply # 1511212 11-Mar-2016 11:56
Send private message

I saw that this morning and immediately said no never




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


5061 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1030

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1511217 11-Mar-2016 12:02
2 people support this post
Send private message

If four people go the "LUX" cinemas at $18 / head then it costs $72. This may be what he has in mind. I'd like to know more about the context. 

 

Movies at home, compared to anything live or in a theatre, are very cheap now....though they are months later. 

To see it at home on the same day it is released in cinemas? No queues? Watch a time that suits you in your own home theatre? Might be worth it. Make it a party. 
My brother has a huge room with about 8 armchairs - complete with cupholders - and large overhead projector onto a 200" (at least) wall-mounted screen. Ten people watching the latest Star Wars for $50 would be a good deal.  

 

He's probably talking up his book..... :-)  





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


Stu

Hammered
4975 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1036

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1511219 11-Mar-2016 12:03
2 people support this post
Send private message

Well some might be happy to, but I wouldn't pay that much. 

 

Not the same ambience as seeing it in a movie theatre. It's part of the reason for seeing it in a theatre in the first place.

 

If I just wanted to watch it at home, I'd wait until it wasn't a new release. 





Keep calm, and carry on posting.

 

 

 

Click to see full size Click to see full size


gzt

9827 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1470


  Reply # 1511221 11-Mar-2016 12:07
One person supports this post
Send private message

The real question is will you buy a set top box and do this nearly every week to validate the business model?

5061 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1030

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1511223 11-Mar-2016 12:08
2 people support this post
Send private message

Stu:

 

Well some might be happy to, but I wouldn't pay that much. 

 

Not the same ambience as seeing it in a movie theatre. It's part of the reason for seeing it in a theatre in the first place.

 

If I just wanted to watch it at home, I'd wait until it wasn't a new release. 

 

 

I'm probably too free with my money. $50 for a release-day viewing of a new movie could be great value for anything more than two people. Single guys will be thinking WTF....but a group of friends or a family with several kids....there is value there if you have the viewing infrastructure to let everyone see it properly. 
 





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


gzt

9827 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1470


  Reply # 1511231 11-Mar-2016 12:20
5 people support this post
Send private message

I plan to market an attachment to the set top box which will use the excess heat to maintain a reservoir of chocolate topping for the ice creams.

As the action increases the excess heat from the CPU will then be used to pop individual grains of popcorn until a large tub is full of chocolate dipped popcorn at half time interval.

There will be no popcorn during serious movies with no action. This is by design.

2600 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 614


  Reply # 1511234 11-Mar-2016 12:27
One person supports this post
Send private message

People are quite prepared to pay a lot more than that to go and see their favourite band for a two hour concert.. Is there a big difference.





Common sense is not as common as you think.




2610 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 604

Trusted

  Reply # 1511258 11-Mar-2016 12:31
One person supports this post
Send private message

Linuxluver:

 

I'm probably too free with my money. $50 for a release-day viewing of a new movie could be great value for anything more than two people. Single guys will be thinking WTF....but a group of friends or a family with several kids....there is value there if you have the viewing infrastructure to let everyone see it properly. 
 

 

 

Yep, that's one area where I could see this succeeding.

 

I read the Variety article that this one linked to. Apparently the plan is to appease movie theatres by giving a substantial portion of the fee (USD $20 was quoted) back to them. They also plan that $50 movie rentals would include two movie tickets to see it at the theatre of their choice. So the theatres can profit from confectionary stand sales.

 

So while it sounds crazy on the surface, it's an idea that may actually have some legs.


3148 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 883

Trusted

  Reply # 1511259 11-Mar-2016 12:33
One person supports this post
Send private message

vexxxboy:

 

People are quite prepared to pay a lot more than that to go and see their favourite band for a two hour concert.. Is there a big difference.

 

 

 

 

Yes


Stu

Hammered
4975 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1036

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1511260 11-Mar-2016 12:33
One person supports this post
Send private message

vexxxboy:

 

People are quite prepared to pay a lot more than that to go and see their favourite band for a two hour concert.. Is there a big difference.

 

 

It's not the price, it's what you get for it. Going to see a good band in concert with thousands of other people is not the same as seeing it perform on TV. Same as watching a great movie in a theatre. 

 

Would I pay $75 for a new release movie if I had a 120" (or larger) screen at home? Perhaps! I don't have a screen that large though, so no I wouldn't pay $75 to stay home and watch it.





Keep calm, and carry on posting.

 

 

 

Click to see full size Click to see full size


2051 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1511268 11-Mar-2016 12:46
Send private message

My issue is that there are only one or two movies a year that I really want to see on release day. I'm pretty OK with waiting for the rest to turn up on iTunes for rent.





When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


Mad Scientist
18446 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2338

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1511270 11-Mar-2016 12:46
Send private message

If i had a home theatre and loads of money quite likely. I have neither.

JWR

738 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 236


  Reply # 1511280 11-Mar-2016 12:57

 

 

Of all people, Sean Parker people proposing this! That is ironic!


3887 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 480

Trusted

  Reply # 1511283 11-Mar-2016 13:00
Send private message

Price has come down.  I saw something similar about a year or 2 ago.  You needed a $350k digital projector and the movie was in the order of 10s of thousands.

 

I was designed for Hollywood types, and essentially you were a movie theatre at home and you received a digital copy the same as the theatres did.





Previously known as psycik

NextPVR/OpenHAB: 
Gigabyte AMD A8 Brix --> Samsung LA46A650D via HDMI, NextPVR,OpenHAB with Aeotech ZWave Controller
Media:Chromecast v2, ATV4, Roku3, Raspberry PI temperature Sensors and Bluetooth LE Sensors,HDHomeRun Dual
Windows 2012 
Host (Plex Server/Crashplan): 2x2TB, 2x3TB, 1x4TB using DriveBender, Samsung 850 evo 512 GB SSD, Hyper-V Server with 1xW10, 1xW2k8, 2xUbuntu 16.04 LTS, Crashplan, NextPVR channel for Plex,NextPVR Metadata Agent and Scanner for Plex


2344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1133


  Reply # 1511297 11-Mar-2016 13:16
Send private message

dclegg:

 

I read the Variety article that this one linked to. Apparently the plan is to appease movie theatres by giving a substantial portion of the fee (USD $20 was quoted) back to them. They also plan that $50 movie rentals would include two movie tickets to see it at the theatre of their choice. So the theatres can profit from confectionary stand sales.

 

 

So the theatre is going to get 40% of the fee for doing absolutely nothing. You could make a very comfortable living by owning a theatre that you kept closed... no power, wages, maintenance, etc. And all your prospective customers would be forced to watch movies at home... If the theatres don't go for it, I guess we can assume that their profit margin is somewhat more than that. 

 

The free tickets seem to me to be valueless... if you would rather pay $50 to see the movie at home, why wouldn't you pay another $50 (or substantially less in a couple of months) to see it again, at home?

 

 


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.