Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


BDFL - Memuneh
61323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12066

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 225770 5-Dec-2017 09:46
Send private message

Coming in early 2018... By the same company behind Stuff Fibre: Stuff Pix.

 

Because we need a Netflix, Amazon Instant Video, Quickflix competitor.





Create new topic

xpd

Chief Trash Bandit
8983 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1383

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1913143 5-Dec-2017 10:16
2 people support this post
Send private message

QF is still a thing ? 

 

 





XPD / Gavin / DemiseNZ

 

For Free Games, Geekiness and Reviews, visit :

 

Home Of The Overrated Raccoons

 

Battlenet : XPD#11535    Origin/Steam/Epic/Uplay : xpdnz


xpd

Chief Trash Bandit
8983 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1383

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1913192 5-Dec-2017 10:47
One person supports this post
Send private message

The comments on the Stuff article are amusing.... people calling for CC to block it, and Sky to drag them into court etc - must be Sky employees :)





XPD / Gavin / DemiseNZ

 

For Free Games, Geekiness and Reviews, visit :

 

Home Of The Overrated Raccoons

 

Battlenet : XPD#11535    Origin/Steam/Epic/Uplay : xpdnz


1552 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 353


  Reply # 1913220 5-Dec-2017 11:26
One person supports this post
Send private message

They will only be able to give us 3,4+ month old movies .

To be honest , just another service offering a product thats stuck in the past. Give the people current releases to stream.
Wait 3-6 months and its just encouraging piracy. We want to stream new movies now, in 3,4 months we arnt interested

Imagine if music or game industry tried the same thing .....
sorry you cant stream the latest songs or buy them on itunes .
You need to wait 3 months before we let you access that song ,album, game from your home.


13430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2428

Trusted

  Reply # 1913226 5-Dec-2017 11:34
Send private message

1101:

 

They will only be able to give us 3,4+ month old movies .

To be honest , just another service offering a product thats stuck in the past. Give the people current releases to stream.
Wait 3-6 months and its just encouraging piracy. We want to stream new movies now, in 3,4 months we arnt interested

Imagine if music or game industry tried the same thing .....
sorry you cant stream the latest songs or buy them on itunes .
You need to wait 3 months before we let you access that song ,album, game from your home.

 

 

 

 

When you put it like that, yes I agree. Wasn't someone looking at this a year or more ago? Essentially its a high price designed to allow you to stream it now, instead of going to the cinema, I think it was about $50. Cinema type price.  If that came to pass, you can stream it now, and pay a cinema price, but you would need to wait a few months to get the cheap price, aka NF iTunes etc


1391 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 583


  Reply # 1913241 5-Dec-2017 12:02
Send private message

xpd:

 

QF is still a thing ? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It said in the article that Stuff Pix had bought the NZ rights package off the NZ branch of Quikflix, so I assume QF have exited NZ.

 

Which makes Stuff Pix basically a replacement for Quikflix, which had a reputation as a highly desirable service, making it a hugely profitable operation (or not).


1372 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 215


  Reply # 1913296 5-Dec-2017 13:20
Send private message

No one is focused mainly on movies for subscription at moment.

Neon prob has best range but I don't like way they implement their service.

Netflix is limited range and older. Apple is pay per view only.
It says on website direct from cinema to your home, sounds like newer then others for movies,
If subscription comes down to price, devices and if surround sound, if pay per view it's plenty covered' by others.

Lol found stuff article, pay per view $1-$7, pretty sure companies told what price to do pay per view so they don't under cut each other. I know Hollywood was upset with Apple for doing UHD same price as HD, but look like there was a back down by Hollywood there.

13430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2428

Trusted

  Reply # 1913322 5-Dec-2017 13:51
Send private message

It’s a replacement for video stores that’s what the article said and the pricing indicates

52 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 1913495 5-Dec-2017 20:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

Google "Paddy Buckley" and you'll see he was GM of Quickflix NZ, which appears to have closed top office (not sure about service?).

 

If all they are doing is taking over Quickflix rights, then it'll be a poor service.

 

I checked out a number of services to compare my DVD queue on Fatso (after they announced they were closing).

 

With 81 movies in my Fatso queue...

 

  • Fatso had 64 available before they closed
  • Neon had 5
  • Netflix had 11
  • Quickflix had 0
  • Alice had 27
  • Aro had 61

Alice has launched a DVD postal service. Aro always had one, but it is not cheap...but they say they are working on it. Both Alice and Aro don't include new or recent releases in their schemes.

 

Cheers,

 

Phil


2561 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1207


  Reply # 1913548 5-Dec-2017 20:51
Send private message

It's not much of a replacement for video stores. 600 films is pretty pathetic, and equates about 2 percent of the around 30,000 titles that I have read Aro Street Video has. I know several people with more films than that (legally) in their home collection.

 

Having said that, I might use it for casual viewing of the odd recent release film if:

 

  • it's seamless to use - easy to get on the TV, without obnoxious DRM or other hoops, and doesn't require a computer to be hooked up to the telly etc (I don't watch movies on my laptop)
  • I can purchase casually rather than an ongoing subscription
  • films are available in a decent resolution/bitrate/quality, in terms of both picture and sound (at a bare minimum, at least 720p and 5.1)
  • it has decent and recent films that I actually want to watch, and
  • the pricing is reasonable.

Unless all of these things are true, I'm not interested.


14353 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1866


  Reply # 1913553 5-Dec-2017 20:57
Send private message

Very difficult market to start up in and compete in I suspect. But good luck to them. 


52 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 1913554 5-Dec-2017 20:58
Send private message

"...odd recent release film..."

 

Yeah that's the bit I'm not expecting to see on their service.

 

Phil


130 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  Reply # 1914572 7-Dec-2017 12:52
Send private message

I would pay $75+ a go to stream a currently in theater film at home on my TV.

 

It costs me more than that to go to the theater and hire babysitters etc.

 

I miss movies because of the planning it needs to go into organizing the events.

 

 


Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.