freitasm:
@zocster:
Just the time to test this, it has not been proven either way. So I would rather be safe than sorry. 2 years is not enough time for a trial.
Sorry but you are locked out of this discussion now. We can't have anti-vax non-sense in here.
I'm not suggesting that this is what is happening here but this what I typically see with some of the antivaxer discourse:
Pfizer vaccine available
"I want to wait for Astrazenea"
x months later... Astrazena is offered as an option...
"I want to wait for Novavax"
x+y months later... Novavax is offered as an option...
"2 years is too short - I need to wait to see the long term effects"
5 years later...
"Well there isn't a need for the vaccine anymore"
The problem is that the goalposts keep shifting. There is tons of research being done on these vaccines, many scientific and peer reviewed articles, government-health agency reviews... I'm not saying that there is no risk taking a vaccine (there is risk in every thing we do), I'm saying that the "breaking truths" on Facebook etc are not exactly built on a solid fact base. With the sheer metric ton of media attention on all things Covid, you can be assured that any concerns will spread like wildfire.