|
|
|
itxtme: Ah the old health service debate. Here are some facts, like it or lump it - its reality
- There is limited money
- Service creep is consuming more of this money
- Politicians tell people what they want to hear, not the honest truth that is 'We cant do the best for everyone, the budgets dont allow it'. People need to either pay more tax, pay for the services they receive or accept the health service in NZ for what it is.
- We are not alone, the NHS in the UK is suffering similar problems
itxtme: Ah the old health service debate. Here are some facts, like it or lump it - its reality
- There is limited money
- Service creep is consuming more of this money
- Politicians tell people what they want to hear, not the honest truth that is 'We cant do the best for everyone, the budgets dont allow it'. People need to either pay more tax, pay for the services they receive or accept the health service in NZ for what it is.
- We are not alone, the NHS in the UK is suffering similar problems
tdgeek:Geektastic: Regular checkups and basic fillings etc are as much a part of healthcare as fixing broken bones and hernia repair I would say.
Sure, getting that Hasselhoff Smile is vanity dentistry, but basic checkups and maintenance do not seem any less a part of healthcare than going to your GP - which only costs about $50.
It just seems odd that one kind of medical attention is more or less free at the point of use, and the other isn't - despite their interactions.
For example, in my case a dental bill of (say) $500 a year could prevent a medical emergency costing tens of thousands. I am sure there are other instances of similar nature.
I'm not really arguing one way or the other, merely curious as to why it has been left out when attending a GP has not. Seems illogical.
Scratch hernia repair, thats not covered ny health system now. Unless you are in writhing pain, you need to pay circa 5-8k
Perhaps dentistry is seen the same, its not life threatening, so live with it or pay for it

Jaxson: And then we enter into the politics debate...
mattwnz:joker97: because our health care model seems to be the one of the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff catching people who fell down instead of the one with barriers up the top to prevent people from falling down?
I don't know. i don't understand health care models
Have you watched Michael Moores documentary on the US health system. It will make you glad that we live in NZ. But it looks like the UK and Canadian systems maybe better than ours. In the UK it showed a cashier at the hospital, but they actually gave out money to pay for peoples taxi home.

Geektastic:mattwnz:joker97: because our health care model seems to be the one of the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff catching people who fell down instead of the one with barriers up the top to prevent people from falling down?
I don't know. i don't understand health care models
Have you watched Michael Moores documentary on the US health system. It will make you glad that we live in NZ. But it looks like the UK and Canadian systems maybe better than ours. In the UK it showed a cashier at the hospital, but they actually gave out money to pay for peoples taxi home.
The UK NHS is the largest civilian employer in the West, IIRC. Over 500,000 staff or some such nonsense!
It works more or less, but lordy it costs a lot of money to run. Somewhere approaching the equivalent of NZ $300 billion...!
Argument 2:
ajobbins: The NHS in the UK has funded dental for a long time with good results (or as I understand). They are now looking (or already have?) stripping much of the dental from the NHS to try and save money.

wasabi2k:Jaxson: And then we enter into the politics debate...
I think it takes about 5 seconds for this to become a political debate. It is assigning priority to government spending - and then it becomes a tax discussion.
I think everyone would agree full, free healthcare for everyone would be great - but noone wants to pay for it.
The question about offering people lower tax vs medical care when they need it - I believe you are massively underestimating greed. I would say the majority would choose lower tax - immediate benefit vs possible later benefit. I don't agree with that, but it wouldn't surprise me.

Athlonite: I asked my dentist why he charges so much and this is what he told me: by the time he'd done 5 years dentistry school and set up his practice he owed a whopping 1 million bucks. well really that's alot of money so how come you can go to Queenstown every year for a ski trip then and to Hawaii for two weeks a year with the whole family
itxtme: Ah the old health service debate. Here are some facts, like it or lump it - its reality
- There is limited money
- Service creep is consuming more of this money
- Politicians tell people what they want to hear, not the honest truth that is 'We cant do the best for everyone, the budgets dont allow it'. People need to either pay more tax, pay for the services they receive or accept the health service in NZ for what it is.
- We are not alone, the NHS in the UK is suffering similar problems
Twitter: ajobbins
Geektastic:wasabi2k:Jaxson: And then we enter into the politics debate...
I think it takes about 5 seconds for this to become a political debate. It is assigning priority to government spending - and then it becomes a tax discussion.
I think everyone would agree full, free healthcare for everyone would be great - but noone wants to pay for it.
The question about offering people lower tax vs medical care when they need it - I believe you are massively underestimating greed. I would say the majority would choose lower tax - immediate benefit vs possible later benefit. I don't agree with that, but it wouldn't surprise me.
You can adjust what you spend money on without increasing the total - but that too will rapidly become political.
It would be interesting to see a model where everyone gets, say, $750 of 'free' dentistry per year or something so at least basic maintenance was covered.
SepticSceptic:Athlonite: I asked my dentist why he charges so much and this is what he told me: by the time he'd done 5 years dentistry school and set up his practice he owed a whopping 1 million bucks. well really that's alot of money so how come you can go to Queenstown every year for a ski trip then and to Hawaii for two weeks a year with the whole family
What was his answer to that ?
|
|
|