Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




BDFL - Memuneh
63601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 14079

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

# 138650 12-Jan-2014 12:45
Send private message

Seriously, something is wrong in this country. Just read "Who is funding the anti-fluoride High Court action" and who are the companies|entitities behind it.

Yes, there you go... The same folks that believe in chemtrails and anti-vaccine are the ones running companies with interest in alternative medicine and "natural" stuff.

The bad thing as disclosed in that blog is that this entity is registered as a charitable trust, meaning it's exempt of tax.

Indeed.

 





View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2

gzt

10749 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1779


  # 965449 12-Jan-2014 13:30
Send private message

Imho ending water fluoridation is still a valid legal purpose for a charity. Same as providing a home for invisible pink unicorns. Still legally valid I presume. IIUC they are still liable for GST on any services provided/contracted, any employees are still liable for income tax. The blogger does not really explain why (or even if) he thinks this particular entity contravenes the Charities Act, or why providing a home for invisible pink unicorns should not be tax deductible or provide any draft criteria for deciding tax deductible/charity status in doubtful cases. I expect this is a problem in many countries.

844 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 200


  # 965450 12-Jan-2014 13:32
Send private message

No big surprise. In the UK, the largest group campaigning against wind power is fully government funded.

 
 
 
 




BDFL - Memuneh
63601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 14079

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  # 965452 12-Jan-2014 13:33
Send private message

gzt: Imho ending water fluoridation is still a valid legal purpose for a charity. Same as providing a home for invisible pink unicorns. Still legally valid I presume. IIUC they are still liable for GST on any services provided/contracted, any employees are still liable for income tax. The blogger does not really explain why (or even if) he thinks this particular entity contravenes the Charities Act, or why providing a home for invisible pink unicorns should not be tax deductible or provide any draft criteria for deciding tax deductible/charity status in doubtful cases. I expect this is a problem in many countries.


So you are fine with tax exemptions to an entity that posts in their website videos from "Conspiracy Con" about chemtrails?

If they want to advocate that, fine with me. Just don't get a tax free ride.






2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  # 965455 12-Jan-2014 13:39
Send private message

Here in NZ the definition of charity seems to be totally different to the definition of the word in many other countries, including where I am from.

IMO a charity is an organization which is setup to provide help or raise money for the needy. Having a look at the dictionary it seems my definition is correct.

These nutters should not be exempt from tax.

844 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 200


  # 965462 12-Jan-2014 13:41
Send private message

freitasm:
gzt: Imho ending water fluoridation is still a valid legal purpose for a charity. Same as providing a home for invisible pink unicorns. Still legally valid I presume. IIUC they are still liable for GST on any services provided/contracted, any employees are still liable for income tax. The blogger does not really explain why (or even if) he thinks this particular entity contravenes the Charities Act, or why providing a home for invisible pink unicorns should not be tax deductible or provide any draft criteria for deciding tax deductible/charity status in doubtful cases. I expect this is a problem in many countries.


So you are fine with tax exemptions to an entity that posts in their website videos from "Conspiracy Con" about chemtrails?

If they want to advocate that, fine with me. Just don't get a tax free ride.




I'd give them a 25% tax break if the videos were produced in NZ.

844 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 200


  # 965466 12-Jan-2014 13:48
One person supports this post
Send private message

Klipspringer: Here in NZ the definition of charity seems to be totally different to the definition of the word in many other countries, including where I am from.

IMO a charity is an organization which is setup to provide help or raise money for the needy. Having a look at the dictionary it seems my definition is correct.

These nutters should not be exempt from tax.


So, an organisation that exists to protect an endangered species, or to provide shelter for abused animals, or to perform medical research should not count?

gzt

10749 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1779


  # 965471 12-Jan-2014 13:50
Send private message

freitasm:
gzt: Imho ending water fluoridation is still a valid legal purpose for a charity. Same as providing a home for invisible pink unicorns. Still legally valid I presume. IIUC they are still liable for GST on any services provided/contracted, any employees are still liable for income tax. The blogger does not really explain why (or even if) he thinks this particular entity contravenes the Charities Act, or why providing a home for invisible pink unicorns should not be tax deductible or provide any draft criteria for deciding tax deductible/charity status in doubtful cases. I expect this is a problem in many countries.


So you are fine with tax exemptions to an entity that posts in their website videos from "Conspiracy Con" about chemtrails?

Not really. But I do think some objective criteria is needed otherwise we risk somewhat arbitrary discrimination on the basis of things we disagree with.

jpoc: I'd give them a 25% tax break if the videos were produced in NZ.

Lollolols : )

 
 
 
 


2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  # 965472 12-Jan-2014 13:52
Send private message

jpoc:
Klipspringer: Here in NZ the definition of charity seems to be totally different to the definition of the word in many other countries, including where I am from.

IMO a charity is an organization which is setup to provide help or raise money for the needy. Having a look at the dictionary it seems my definition is correct.

These nutters should not be exempt from tax.


So, an organisation that exists to protect an endangered species, or to provide shelter for abused animals, or to perform medical research should not count?


I agree that these services should be exempt from Tax.

But under the definition of the word no they should not be charities.

4524 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 880

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 965484 12-Jan-2014 14:13
Send private message

I don't see any issue here. We live in so called democratic system - everyone should have the same right to believe whatever they want. Just because we think they are 'wrong' it does not make them less entitled than us.







BDFL - Memuneh
63601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 14079

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  # 965490 12-Jan-2014 14:35
Send private message

nakedmolerat: I don't see any issue here. We live in so called democratic system - everyone should have the same right to believe whatever they want. Just because we think they are 'wrong' it does not make them less entitled than us.


They can believe in whatever they want. When their belief (which is not founded on any scientific study) gets incentives from the state then it's wrong. There must be a separation between state and belief.






2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  # 965491 12-Jan-2014 14:38
Send private message

nakedmolerat: I don't see any issue here. We live in so called democratic system - everyone should have the same right to believe whatever they want. Just because we think they are 'wrong' it does not make them less entitled than us.


Thats not the issue.
I think the real issue here is with the tax exemption.

Everybody in this country is able to believe what they want last time I checked.

4524 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 880

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 965496 12-Jan-2014 14:45
Send private message

freitasm:
nakedmolerat: I don't see any issue here. We live in so called democratic system - everyone should have the same right to believe whatever they want. Just because we think they are 'wrong' it does not make them less entitled than us.


They can believe in whatever they want. When their belief (which is not founded on any scientific study) gets incentives from the state then it's wrong. There must be a separation between state and belief.




Religion can never be proved scientifically, should we stop grants/incentives given to associations affiliated to religion etc? Eg: salvation army - provide food for homeless etc





2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  # 965497 12-Jan-2014 14:50
Send private message

nakedmolerat:
Religion can never be proved scientifically, should we stop grants/incentives given to associations affiliated to religion etc? Eg: salvation army - provide food for homeless etc


Why not. All the money I get back from my donations to our church each year goes right back to the Church anyway.




656 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted

  # 965498 12-Jan-2014 14:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

nakedmolerat: Religion can never be proved scientifically, should we stop grants/incentives given to associations affiliated to religion etc? Eg: salvation army - provide food for homeless etc


Yes, if the grants/incentives are targetted towards religious activity. If the activities are charitable and not contingent on their religious status (i.e. any charitable organisation would do similar activities regardless of affiliation) then I don't see the issue.

gzt

10749 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1779


  # 965501 12-Jan-2014 15:08
Send private message

Current wording of the act: "Meaning of charitable purpose and effect of ancillary non-charitable purpose" : "(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, charitable purpose includes every charitable purpose, whether it relates to the relief of poverty, the advancement of education or religion, or any other matter beneficial to the community".

I do not see any need for tax exemption for any of that.

What is the argument in favor of tax exemption?

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Switch your broadband provider now - compare prices


Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand PC Market declines on the back of high channel inventory, IDC reports
Posted 18-Jun-2019 17:35


Air New Zealand uses drones to inspect aircraft
Posted 17-Jun-2019 15:39


TCL Electronics launches its first-ever 8K TV
Posted 17-Jun-2019 15:18


E-scooter share scheme launches in Wellington
Posted 17-Jun-2019 12:34


Anyone can broadcast with Kordia Pop Up TV
Posted 13-Jun-2019 10:51


Volvo and Uber present production vehicle ready for self-driving
Posted 13-Jun-2019 10:47


100,000 customers connected to fibre broadband network through Enable
Posted 13-Jun-2019 10:35


5G uptake even faster than expected
Posted 12-Jun-2019 10:01


Xbox showcases 60 anticipated games
Posted 10-Jun-2019 20:24


Trend Micro Turns Public Hotspots into Secure Networks with WiFi Protection for Mobile Devices
Posted 5-Jun-2019 13:24


Bold UK spinoff for beauty software company Flossie
Posted 2-Jun-2019 14:10


Amazon Introduces Echo Show 5
Posted 1-Jun-2019 15:32


Epson launches new 4K Pro-UHD projector technology
Posted 1-Jun-2019 15:26


Lenovo and Qualcomm unveil first 5G PC called Project Limitless
Posted 28-May-2019 20:23


Intel introduces new 10th Gen Intel Core Processors and Project Athena
Posted 28-May-2019 19:28



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.