Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

#198543 13-Jul-2016 10:53
Send private message

As people around me on the southern motorway in Auckland were whizzing along at 110kph to 120kph (and beyond) yesterday I began to wonder what difference those speeds made on CO2 (and other) emissions.

 

I was thinking this because in talking to people I do find many are concerned by about climate change and many of those bemoan the government's relatively passive approach and official "adaptation" (ie: do nothing, really) policy. 

 

Assuming one takes the issue seriously (the evidence is now very clear that we should) the next thought is something like: "Well....what can I do now right now that will make any difference?" 

One of the answers is simply: slow down. 

When driving at 115kph in a 1.4L-2.0L petrol-powered car you're producing over 50% *more* CO2 than if you just drive at 100kph. Those are defacto "illegal" and unnecessary emissions as those speeds are illegal anyway. At 130kph over the limit you're off the chart and more than double the emissions at 100kph.

So....here is a simple, practical thing each of us who drive petrol cars (I still own one, too) can do, right now - today - to reduce our CO2 emissions.

Even you don't care about emissions, you can save 12% to 18% of your motorway (at least) fuel costs by driving at 100kph instead of 120kph. 

 

(source) Note that the EU cars often have higher emissions standards than apply in NZ

 

 

 

  

 

 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
mentalinc
3167 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1590863 13-Jul-2016 10:58
Send private message

you can save 12% to 18% of your motorway (at least) fuel costs by driving at 100kph instead of 120kph. 

 

 

 

But if you're going 20% faster for only 12% more fuel....





CPU: AMD 5900x | RAM: GSKILL Trident Z Neo RGB F4-3600C16D-32GTZNC-32-GB | MB:  Asus X570-E | GFX: EVGA FTW3 Ultra RTX 3080Ti| Monitor: LG 27GL850-B 2560x1440

 

Quic: https://account.quic.nz/refer/473833 R473833EQKIBX 


 
 
 
 

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).
andrew027
1286 posts

Uber Geek


  #1590868 13-Jul-2016 11:01
Send private message

@linuxluver. Good post. But how is it even possible to drive over 40km/h on an Auckland motorway? wink


Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1590874 13-Jul-2016 11:16
Send private message

andrew027:

 

@linuxluver. Good post. But how is it even possible to drive over 40km/h on an Auckland motorway? wink

 

 

:-) I hear you. 

 

Off-peak and / or against the flow (out of town when everyone is headed in, for example)  it's possible to go pretty fast.....I'm told.  :-)

 

 

 

 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 




nakedmolerat
4625 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1590879 13-Jul-2016 11:19
Send private message

I always tend to live my diesel running for 1 hour or 2 while waiting at the parking lot. I always wonder how much emission I contribute unnecessarily. Do you know if diesel or petrol produce more CO2?

Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1590881 13-Jul-2016 11:20
Send private message

mentalinc:

 

you can save 12% to 18% of your motorway (at least) fuel costs by driving at 100kph instead of 120kph. 

 

 

 

But if you're going 20% faster for only 12% more fuel....

 

 

What a deal, eh! :-) 

 

Yeah...that's where the concern about climate change kicks in and you take ownership of your small piece of the problem. 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1590885 13-Jul-2016 11:25
Send private message

nakedmolerat: I always tend to live my diesel running for 1 hour or 2 while waiting at the parking lot. I always wonder how much emission I contribute unnecessarily. Do you know if diesel or petrol produce more CO2?

 

They are about the same for CO2. But deisel also produces a host of very active carcinogens that are now seeing it phased out of light vehicle fleets. It's just too hard to meet emissions standards when  alternatives like electric cars are now on the cusp of being practical, thanks to huge advances in cheaper batteries.

 

In 2 years we'll see a wide range of EV cars with 60kw to 80kw battery packs with zero emissions that can do 300km-500km per charge. So that's basically one or two 15-20 minute charges between Wellington and Auckland....in an utterly clean vehicle with (generally) far more power than a diesel or petrol car of the same class.  

 

The 80kw motor in a Nissan LEAF should be very interesting to any would-be boy racer.....and that's an early-days EV with a 200+km range (2016 models with 30kw battery packs) you can buy right now via imports for about $40K.  





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


BTR

BTR
1527 posts

Uber Geek


  #1590886 13-Jul-2016 11:27
Send private message

If all of NZ drove at the correct speed and turns lights off when we weren't using them and even turned off the LED lights on network switches it wouldn't make a dent on the worlds C02 emissions. 

 

 

 

The planet will recover itself even after humans have wiped themselves out. Nature has an impressive way of adapting and repairing itself.




Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1590893 13-Jul-2016 11:29
Send private message

BTR:

 

If all of NZ drove at the correct speed and turns lights off when we weren't using them and even turned off the LED lights on network switches it wouldn't make a dent on the worlds C02 emissions. 

 

 

 

The planet will recover itself even after humans have wiped themselves out. Nature has an impressive way of adapting and repairing itself.

 

 

Your logic is true of any single group of 4.5 million people. They could al use that excuse...and thus 7 billion people do nothing. 

 

It's corrupt thinking. It's negligent. It's irresponsible (in the meaning of failing to be responsible). 

 

It's how this government thinks...and a HUGE part of the reason why we need a new one with a functioning conscience. This one isn't it. 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


rendezvous
194 posts

Master Geek


  #1590897 13-Jul-2016 11:33
Send private message

Is the additional CO emissions per km travelled, or per hour driving? I assume it's per km travelled. If it's per hour of driving, then you have to factor in the reduced amount of time spent on the road as you reach your destination faster.

SaltyNZ
8088 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #1590900 13-Jul-2016 11:34
Send private message

BTR:

 

 

 

The planet will recover itself even after humans have wiped themselves out. 

 

 

 

 

Probably. But wouldn't it be better if we let it recover before we wiped ourselves out?





iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1590930 13-Jul-2016 12:30
Send private message

rendezvous: Is the additional CO emissions per km travelled, or per hour driving? I assume it's per km travelled. If it's per hour of driving, then you have to factor in the reduced amount of time spent on the road as you reach your destination faster.

 

Saving 10% of time doesn't justify 50% more emissions to any rational person. 

 

Anyway.....this post was intended to inform people who share a concern about CO2 emissions. I understand some people aren't yet ready to be concerned about this. 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


andrew027
1286 posts

Uber Geek


  #1590946 13-Jul-2016 13:02
Send private message

SaltyNZ:

 

BTR: The planet will recover itself even after humans have wiped themselves out.
 

 

Probably. But wouldn't it be better if we let it recover before we wiped ourselves out? 

 

My thoughts exactly. I would prefer not to have to wait for that condition to be met.


k1wi
484 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1590967 13-Jul-2016 13:34
Send private message

I think it's pretty obvious that the faster you go the more fuel you use, but...

 

linuxluver: Even you don't care about emissions, you can save 12% to 18% of your motorway (at least) fuel costs by driving at 100kph instead of 120kph.
Not quite - its the savings gained by using a model that 'assum[es] that all drivers fully respect the speed limit [110km/h] and that the vehicles are very smoothly driven at the speed limit. This is an artificial condition but may demonstrate the maximum potential results of introducing a new speed limit.' That model is quite different from the reference ARTEMIS 130: 'a typical driving cycle assuming a speed limit of 120 km/h, which is not fully respected, meaning that some speeding occurs.'

 

A more accurate comparison would be the 2-3% reduction of ARTEMIS 120 [similar model parameters to ARTEMIS 130 but with a speed limit reduction from 120km/h to 110km/h].

 

linuxluver: When driving at 115kph in a 1.4L-2.0L petrol-powered car you're producing over 50% *more* CO2 than if you just drive at 100kph. Those are defacto "illegal" and unnecessary emissions as those speeds are illegal anyway. At 130kph over the limit you're off the chart and more than double the emissions at 100kph.
The document refers to 'mean speed', which suggests (but is not clear because they don't explain a different methodology) they are using models with a maximum speed and speed limit above the mean - ARTEMIS 130 has an average speed of 100km/h and a top speed of 132 km/h, while ARTEMIS 120 has an average speed of 90km/h and a top speed of 122km/h.

 

 

 

* The models are an 'average' 18 minute trip. Despite the different average speeds, each model takes the same amount of time, so I'm not sure whether that means the higher speed model travelled further...?


rendezvous
194 posts

Master Geek


  #1590987 13-Jul-2016 14:05
Send private message

Linuxluver:

rendezvous: Is the additional CO emissions per km travelled, or per hour driving? I assume it's per km travelled. If it's per hour of driving, then you have to factor in the reduced amount of time spent on the road as you reach your destination faster.


Saving 10% of time doesn't justify 50% more emissions to any rational person. 


Anyway.....this post was intended to inform people who share a concern about CO2 emissions. I understand some people aren't yet ready to be concerned about this. 



Yes, you're right.

It does concern me, I was just making sense of the data out loud.

Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1591048 13-Jul-2016 15:37
Send private message

rendezvous:
Linuxluver:

 

rendezvous: Is the additional CO emissions per km travelled, or per hour driving? I assume it's per km travelled. If it's per hour of driving, then you have to factor in the reduced amount of time spent on the road as you reach your destination faster.

 

 

 

Saving 10% of time doesn't justify 50% more emissions to any rational person. 

 

 

 

Anyway.....this post was intended to inform people who share a concern about CO2 emissions. I understand some people aren't yet ready to be concerned about this. 

 



Yes, you're right.

It does concern me, I was just making sense of the data out loud.

 

I can be too earnest.....so sorry if I sounded "judgy". It's a character flaw I try to keep under control. :-)  





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

New Suunto Run Available in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 13-May-2025 21:00


Cricut Maker 4 Review
Posted 12-May-2025 15:18


Dynabook Launches Ultra-Light Portégé Z40L-N Copilot+PC with Self-Replaceable Battery
Posted 8-May-2025 14:08


Shopify Sidekick Gets a Major Reasoning Upgrade, Plus Free Image Generation
Posted 8-May-2025 14:03


Microsoft Introduces New Surface Copilot+ PCs
Posted 8-May-2025 13:56


D-Link A/NZ launches DWR-933M 4G+ LTE Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 Mobile Hotspot
Posted 8-May-2025 13:49


Synology Expands DiskStation Lineup with DS1825+ and DS1525+
Posted 8-May-2025 13:44


JBL Releases Next Generation Flip 7 and Charge 6
Posted 8-May-2025 13:41


Arlo Unveils All-New PoE Adapter With Enhanced Connectivity
Posted 8-May-2025 13:36


Fujifilm Instax Mini 41 Review
Posted 2-May-2025 10:12


Synology DS925+ Review
Posted 23-Apr-2025 15:00


Synology Announces DiskStation DS925+ and DX525 Expansion Unit
Posted 23-Apr-2025 10:34


JBL Tour Pro 3 Review
Posted 22-Apr-2025 16:56


Samsung 9100 Pro NVMe SSD Review
Posted 11-Apr-2025 13:11


Motorola Announces New Mid-tier Phones moto g05 and g15
Posted 4-Apr-2025 00:00









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.







GoodSync is the easiest file sync and backup for Windows and Mac