Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


1459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 738


Topic # 224202 7-Nov-2017 12:48
Send private message

I was driving by Clifton Terrace Model School, in Wellington, at 3:07 pm.

I saw a little girl trying to cross at a speed hump, next to the school.

I stopped, and a car going the other direction stopped.

We had just stopped for less than 5 seconds, when a Silver Toyota Wagon came up behind me.

He didn't stop and passed between our two stopped cars.

I filed a formal complaint at the police, for driving without due care.

However a co-worker said I was just holding up traffic, and causing confusion, because it wasn't a zebra stop.

What do you think?





View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
585 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 94


  Reply # 1896750 7-Nov-2017 12:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

Yup I agree with your coworker. Its not a crossing, so you shouldn't stop, pedestrians shouldn't expect you to stop, other motorists shouldn't expect you to stop. If there was no other traffic around, then fine, stop, but otherwise nope. 

 

We had a similar situation in Titirangi Village, where people were doing exactly what you did (at the speed bumps letting people cross), so the council formalized it, and made them crossings :P


323 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 37


  Reply # 1896757 7-Nov-2017 13:02
5 people support this post
Send private message

Yep, it's not a pedestrian crossing so you shouldn't stop and by you stopping I believe you are actually creating a hazard by encouraging the girl to cross where she shouldn't.




1459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 738


  Reply # 1896766 7-Nov-2017 13:17
Send private message

The school really needs to get some crossing guards, as there is a lot across the street.

I and the other car coming in the opposite direction both stopped at roughly the same time.

The passing car could have tooted his horn, to give me, and more importantly the pedestrian, an indication of what he was doing.

He passed at a good speed, without indicating.

895 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 285


  Reply # 1896767 7-Nov-2017 13:18
7 people support this post
Send private message

You were stopping to let a child cross the road outside a school.  That's OK in my book.  If the law says otherwise, the law is an ass.

 

The other car passed you, in a 50km/h area, outside a school, at a normal "end of school" time, presumably going onto the opposing lane to do so, and with clearly limited visibility of the road in front of you.  That's very poor judgement in my opinion.  They'd better have a bloody good excuse.


382 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Subscriber

  Reply # 1896812 7-Nov-2017 13:36
7 people support this post
Send private message

As there is no pedestrian crossing there, the driver probably thought you were just another parent stopping in the middle of nowhere to pick up their child.

 

 


3385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 919


  Reply # 1896813 7-Nov-2017 13:39
6 people support this post
Send private message

The car that passed you was being a D*(khead

 

Driving is not simply about what the law says, or doesn't say

 

Because if that was the case in Wellington everyone would be tearling round narrow streets doing 50km/h when it is neither safe nor practical....

 

 

 

Stopping to allow a child to cross the road (crossing or not) is the most practicle solution,

 

The counterfactual, is that if you don't stop, and no one else stops, those crossing the road will likely dart out to cross the road and become a greater hazard....

 

 

 

The road code notes

 

Pedestrian safety for drivers

 

  • Always be ready to stop near schools, bus stops and pedestrian crossings
Courtesy crossings

 

Courtesy crossings are usually made of bricks or paving and are often raised above the level of the road.

 

Although not official pedestrian crossings, they do provide a place for pedestrians to cross. Drivers should be courteous to pedestrians using a courtesy crossing.

 

http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/roadcode/about-other-road-users/sharing-road-with-pedestrians/

 

 


3585 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2061

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1896814 7-Nov-2017 13:40
2 people support this post
Send private message

You did the right thing for the kid but in doing so also did the wrong thing, I would of stopped as well and let the child cross

 

Linux





Ex JohnR VodafoneNZ 17 years 4 days

399 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  Reply # 1896819 7-Nov-2017 13:46
2 people support this post
Send private message

I would have stopped to let the child cross as well. Yes it's not a proper crossing but I would rather give them a safe amount of time and space to cross rather than let them try and find a gap in moving traffic.





620 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 217


  Reply # 1896820 7-Nov-2017 13:47
2 people support this post
Send private message

You're lucky that she didn't cross.





Amanon

5109 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2077


  Reply # 1896826 7-Nov-2017 13:57
2 people support this post
Send private message

It's not a courtesy crossing, they are flush with the footpath.  It's a speed bump with a visible taper down to the gutter.

 

I think this is a situation where an act of kindness, actually creates an ambiguous situation.

 

You stop.  Kid crosses road (actually didn't cross in this case).  But have other drivers realised why you stopped and reacted accordingly?

 

I'd like to think if I was in the silver station wagon I would have recognised the situation, behaved defensively and not passed you.

 

Driving is easiest and safest when other road users behave predictably.   Although as people we want to be kind, other road users find us most predictable for other road users if we just follow the rules.

 

I think the kid (by not crossing) proved the most astute road user in the interaction.





Mike



1459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 738


  Reply # 1896853 7-Nov-2017 14:33
Send private message

I've driven all over the world, for too many decades.

I find Auckland and Wellington drivers on par with Mexico, Italy and France for aggressive drivers.

US drivers are a mixed bag: Northeast and Texan drivers are super aggressive, while middle America is super polite.

The difference between Auckland and Wellington is Auckland drivers tend to beep, and Wellington drivers tend to jump into the passing lane, and stay there ad nauseum.

Every day I see situations where a driver has two choices:

- stop / slow down / match the traffic speed

- or floor it / use a car like spear against crossing traffic / jump the queue.

I'd say 95% of the time Kiwis will floor it.

Almost every time, I wind up within a few meters behind them eventually.

It does make me wish for the day self-driving cars arrive.


UHD

656 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 303
Inactive user


  Reply # 1896857 7-Nov-2017 14:42
Send private message

There is no crossing there and it is always better to stick to the road rules. You have right of way so keep going and the road will be clear to cross quickly without anyone being held up. It might feel like a nice thing to do but this isn't a small country town with nil traffic. It is the capital and holding people up for no good reason is viewed as rude.


5109 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2077


  Reply # 1896858 7-Nov-2017 14:43
One person supports this post
Send private message

kingdragonfly:

 

I've driven all over the world, for too many decades.

 

It's OK. Even experienced people make mistakes.

 

The important thing is to learn from it - rather than trying to deflect criticism onto kiwi drivers in general
(several of whom have just provided you helpful feedback).

 

 





Mike

2522 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 937

Subscriber

  Reply # 1896865 7-Nov-2017 15:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

I think both parties are to a degree at fault. Party A has stopped unnecessarily, in a no stopping area, holding up traffic. However, Party B should not be immediately deciding to cross the centre line to dangerously pass. The latter is the more dangerous action, of course, but both unnecessarily increase risk of accident.





Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark



1459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 738


  Reply # 1896866 7-Nov-2017 15:10
Send private message

Tis True. But it seems like there's about 20% of the population that will go to extreme lengths to gain a few seconds.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.