Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


sidders80

755 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#225768 5-Dec-2017 07:28
Send private message

Hi guys seeking opinions and views from both the sides. We are replacing our Mazda 3 with one of the options above. It may be a demo / new depending on the deal we get. I have driven both and although the Nissan is more spacious the Mazda seems more refined with a longer warranty. With the deals I have negotiated with both dealers the Nissan is coming out $4000 cheaper although with a 3 year warranty vs 5 for Mazda. Also it is CVT. 

 

 

 

Any thoughts, opinions, feedback welcome from people who are currently driving or have driven these vehicles. 





Sid

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
MikeB4
18435 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1913053 5-Dec-2017 07:52
Send private message

I have a 2016 Nissan X-Trail 4WD. It has been an awesome vehicle and has had zero issues. It is very well equipped comfortable and a pleasure to drive. We have taken it from one end of the North Island to the other. Fuel economy is great for a vehicle of its size, with the average just over 6 L/100km. The 2.5 litre engine gets it along with ease and hills are a breeze.

The lane departure warning can be a pain at times but can be turned off. Cruise control is simple to use and the cameras etc make parking a piece of cake.



Batman
Mad Scientist
29760 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1913055 5-Dec-2017 07:58
Send private message

for me, space is a biggie. - go nissan.

 

for others, handling is a biggie - go mazda.

 

some choose based on look.

 

some choose based on warranty.

 

for propery soft roading, the nissan's system is more capable than the mazda. but nobody buys suvs for soft roading nowadays.


Dingbatt
6754 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1913056 5-Dec-2017 08:05
Send private message

Looked at both of these a couple of years ago.
I liked the birds eye view parking system in the Nissan. Not as sure about CVT when it comes to towing though. I'm a little gun-shy of that transmission in an SUV after all the trouble Nissan had with the Pathfinder.
There's got to be a reason the CX-5 is so popular. Most car review comparisons rate it top.




“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996




alasta
6703 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1913058 5-Dec-2017 08:22
Send private message

In my view the CX5 is mechanically the better vehicle, but the rear seats can be a bit cramped for larger adult occupants.

 

Check the fine print of the Mazda warranty. I was annoyed when I discovered after I bought mine that it's only three years comprehensive, with the latter two years covering only the powertrain and 'safety systems'.


MikeB4
18435 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1913059 5-Dec-2017 08:26
Send private message

Dingbatt: Looked at both of these a couple of years ago.
I liked the birds eye view parking system in the Nissan. Not as sure about CVT when it comes to towing though. I'm a little gun-shy of that transmission in an SUV after all the trouble Nissan had with the Pathfinder.
There's got to be a reason the CX-5 is so popular. Most car review comparisons rate it top.


I have towed trailers and boat with the X-Trail and the transmission is no issue what so ever.

Dulouz
883 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1913061 5-Dec-2017 08:43
Send private message

Mazda is better than Nissan.





Amanon

gabba
84 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

  #1913068 5-Dec-2017 08:54
Send private message

Hi
We recently "invested" in a pathfinder new. We compared it with the cx9. Not what you are looking at I know but some thoughts on what swayed us..

We are a nissan family. Moving to a cx9 felt like I had to learn where everything was again. That might be a consideration if you are looking to jump brands.

The around car cameras are awesome. It's certainly helped save bumps and scratches. If you think both cars are big you will find the camera system extremely useful.

The xtrail in its different brands is the top selling suv in the world so it can't be too bad. Cvt wise the issue seems to be with pathfinders up to about 2014. It's likely the cvt in the xtrail is different to the one that had trouble anyway. Nissan have been makin cvts for years and are committed to them.

If the pathfinder had the extras the xtrail has I'd be very happy. Oh also nissan are rolling out forward collision avoidance across their range in 2018. Check with the dealer of its not on the xtrail you are looking at.
Hope that helps.

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
BlinkyBill
1443 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1913129 5-Dec-2017 10:00
Send private message

One reason why Pathfinders aren’t popular in the 4WD community is that their frames are prone to cracking. I haven’t verified this recently, but when I bought my Pajero a couple of years ago, it was a known issue.

MikeAqua
7773 posts

Uber Geek


  #1913147 5-Dec-2017 10:19
Send private message

Mazda is nicer, Nissan is bigger and cheaper.

 

CVT would have me walking away from the Nissan, but that's a personal preference.





Mike


Batman
Mad Scientist
29760 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1913286 5-Dec-2017 13:02
Send private message

Dingbatt: Looked at both of these a couple of years ago.
I liked the birds eye view parking system in the Nissan. Not as sure about CVT when it comes to towing though. I'm a little gun-shy of that transmission in an SUV after all the trouble Nissan had with the Pathfinder.
There's got to be a reason the CX-5 is so popular. Most car review comparisons rate it top.

 

I hate to quote James May, but every car's desirability as seen from the eye of car reviewers, is based on how fast it goes round the Nurburgring.

 

The Mazda handles very well.

 

But in terms of space, noise level, comfort etc ... they are nowhere near the top.

 

Beauty on the other hand lie in the eye of the beholder - I like the look of the poor mans' Aston Martin in the prev gen Mazda, but the current gen ones look more like a shark than a car.


gabba
84 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

  #1913289 5-Dec-2017 13:08
Send private message

BlinkyBill: One reason why Pathfinders aren’t popular in the 4WD community is that their frames are prone to cracking. I haven’t verified this recently, but when I bought my Pajero a couple of years ago, it was a known issue.


None of the xtrail, pathfinder, cx9 or likely the cx5 are good off road vehicles these days. They are way too low to the ground for anything interesting. Older pathfinder models were built on a Navara wheel base and we're better off roaders. Newer models aren't.As much as I would like to it wouldn't surprise me if I took my 2017 pathfinder on some hard duty 4wd work and it caused damage.😊

That said the 4WD systems on these cars are useful when better traction is required as well as a bit of light off roading.

Batman
Mad Scientist
29760 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1913294 5-Dec-2017 13:15
Send private message

gabba:
BlinkyBill: One reason why Pathfinders aren’t popular in the 4WD community is that their frames are prone to cracking. I haven’t verified this recently, but when I bought my Pajero a couple of years ago, it was a known issue.


None of the xtrail, pathfinder, cx9 or likely the cx5 are good 4wd vehicles these days. They are way too low to the ground for anything interesting. Older pathfinder models were built on a Navara wheel base and we're better 4wd vehicles. Newer models aren't.As much as I would like to it wouldn't surprise me if I took my 2017 pathfinder on some hard duty 4wd work and it caused damage.😊

 

The reason why the current Pathfinders and Pajeros are not good off road is because they are now built on monocoque chassis for tarmac handling and comfort, compared to the tradiotional body on frame for proper off roaders, not necessarily because of ground clearance, because that has not changed much.


Batman
Mad Scientist
29760 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1913295 5-Dec-2017 13:19
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Mazda is nicer, Nissan is bigger and cheaper.

 

CVT would have me walking away from the Nissan, but that's a personal preference.

 

 

I hate CVTs. I hate anything that doesn't go vroom when you press the pedal. But then again my current and previous cars have CVTs.


scuwp
3885 posts

Uber Geek


  #1913879 6-Dec-2017 15:07
Send private message

Had the same decision 12 months ago and went with the Nissan primarily because of the extra space it offered and way better value for money than the Mazda (I also own a Mazda 3 and love it, so I am not a Mazda hater at all, I quite like and even prefer them). 

 

12 months later absolutely loving the Nissan.  Yes the CVT is a bit different than the traditional tranny but silky smooth to drive and deceptively fast.  The CVT got a bad rep at the start all those years ago but all my research told be there is now little difference in reliability provided they are serviced properly and they are also now very common.  CVT is lighter and more fuel efficient also.  Fuel economy is unbelievable for a vehicle this size!  

 

Horses for course but if space is what you are after I would choose the Nissan.  

 

(PS:  If I had the money it would be a Sante Fe) 

 

 

 

    





Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



sidders80

755 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #1913986 6-Dec-2017 17:28
Send private message

Thanks to everyone for their feedback. We have decided to go with Nissan.





Sid

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.