![]() ![]() |
Perhaps continue in your existing SUV thread?
https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?ForumId=162&TopicId=248732
I just recently bought a CX-5 myself and I went with AWD for the following reasons:
As a general rule if you can't think of any use cases for AWD then you probably don't need it.
If I didn't need AWD I wouldn't buy an SUV. A standard car/hatch would be much more comfortable and economical to drive if AWD isn't needed.
dafman:
Here's a good explanation of the pros and cons of AWD vs FWD - Link here
I have a Outback with Subaru's symmetrical AWD which is full time four wheel drive, so different to the Mazda. To me, the Outback drives like it is on rails, I love driving it.
Is OP talking AWD vs 4WD or FWD? (I had taken it to mean front wheel drive since a lot of the crossovers seem to come in AWD or front wheel drive flavours)
Looking at getting a newer 2nd hand Outback after years driving a Legacy with AWD. Would not be averse to another brand, but I've had the legacy on many unsealed roads, beaches, rough as guts campsites, up Ruapehu on very icy\snowy days, etc and always felt completely safe in it, never got stuck, etc. Rented a AWD Rav4 for a Mt Hutt trip a few months back and while it was fine - I mean it drove well enough, got us up the mountain fine, etc it just didn't quite feel the same. Granted that Mt Hutt drive is a bit of a different drive though ;-) The extra clearance was definitely nice though.
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman
Geektastic: Four. Always four.
Unless it's a sports car and you want to slide the tail, why would you get anything else?
![]() ![]() |