|
|
|
Horner saying that its tough the drivers have to manage tyres. No. If they can spend most of the race managing tyres, use a pitstop so they can hammer two sets. Thats what they used to do, use the tyres for racing, pitstop, use the tyres for racing, pitstop, etc
Why did Vestappen pit? He could have won the race?
Batman:
Why did Vestappen pit? He could have won the race?
Because he had no reason to know that the Mercedes tyres would give up. He wasn't catching and had plenty of time for a stop to put on fresh tyres and give himself a chance for an extra point for fastest lap.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing though.
I think given the same situation and circumstances then Redbull would make the same decision again.
finally something to watch. 2 questions
- why did bothas and vest both pit after vest did 5 laps in the middle?
- is bothas useless? hamilton did a pit stop and then overtook the fella. hamilton >>> bothas?
There was talk about how Bottas didn't get a say in strategy. The whole team strategy was around responding to Verstappen, but that mean Bottas didn't approach it like what do I have to do to cover Hamilton.
Have to love Verstrappons fighting attitude to make something of the day. Telling his team to stop thinking like grandmas and to fully send it and take the opportunity was awesome.
Tyres obviously play a major part in spicing up the racing. Tyres that can normally last a whole race just deprive that area of decision and strategy. With refuelling gone that element of variability and options needs to stay.
wanna know why Ferrari is useless? listen to this. clueless race engineer!
Jaxson:
There was talk about how Bottas didn't get a say in strategy. The whole team strategy was around responding to Verstappen, but that mean Bottas didn't approach it like what do I have to do to cover Hamilton.
Have to love Verstrappons fighting attitude to make something of the day. Telling his team to stop thinking like grandmas and to fully send it and take the opportunity was awesome.
Tyres obviously play a major part in spicing up the racing. Tyres that can normally last a whole race just deprive that area of decision and strategy. With refuelling gone that element of variability and options needs to stay.
Yep. There was a day when tyres were awesome but 20 laps was amazing. Engines had a life of 750km. Tyres could be mandated for a limited life, not by wear but by a rule. Softs 10 laps, medium 15 laps, hard 20 laps, something like that. Effectively mandating X pitstops. Tyre management needs to go. Go hard, stretch it if you like, or add an extra stop and go hard. Races are a lot like FP3, steady and reliable (long runs) then a quali run at the end. I want hard racing for 70 laps. Fuel is there now, tyres need to be used and abused.
for some reason the start of the race was exciting (probably coz it's Spa) but then nothing happened and the 1st 4 at the first corner = 1 2 3 4.
also looked at the f1 calender and there are 3 races in Italy - presumably all at Monza ... hope they spray water on the track at one of them
Yes, there are three GP in Italy this year. Only one is at Monza
I'm basically just watching for F2 and F3 now. It annoys me how the Schumacher era had so much complaining about him being dominant but now that it's a British driver, those same people are now strangely quiet and quite happy with things the way they are, and nothing is going to change until 2022.
|
|
|