Novak Djokovic's entry to Australia rejected, tennis star to be flown out later today

Forums › Sports › Novak Djokovic's entry to Australia rejected, tennis star to be flown out later today

1 | ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 23

3142 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 945

Lifetime subscriber

#2850982 14-Jan-2022 20:20

So the case that got lost was on “procedural fairness grounds”

This time the reason is “health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.”

Also says “as his lawyers prepare to file an immediate injunction against the decision.” so the Ministers decision can be challenged in courts and not final. Looks like they will challenge so game not over yet.

heavenlywild

5091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 901

Trusted

#2851008 14-Jan-2022 20:27

Honestly, he should just get the jab.

As I said on page one, good riddance.

His reputation is in pieces after recent reports of him out and about with covid, and somehow forgetting he was in multiple countries before arriving in Oz.

Those arrival forms should he filled in himself. I thought that was the rule.

Either way, all his own doing.

heavenlywild

5091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 901

Trusted

#2851009 14-Jan-2022 20:33

Just thinking how this will make his travels so much harder in the future.

He could be banned for a few years from entering Oz.

He would also need to explain why he was deported from Oz everytime he tries to enter any country.

No amount of money will buy him out of his new "record".

billgates

4706 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 672

Trusted

#2851010 14-Jan-2022 20:34

SERVED

Do whatever you want to do man.

JaseNZ

2576 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1489

ID Verified

Lifetime subscriber

#2851011 14-Jan-2022 20:35

Yeah his father will be pis*ed and will make a huge raquet about it.

Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man

Kyanar

4089 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1684

ID Verified

Trusted

#2851014 14-Jan-2022 20:48

rugrat:

So the case that got lost was on “procedural fairness grounds”

This time the reason is “health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.”

Also says “as his lawyers prepare to file an immediate injunction against the decision.” so the Ministers decision can be challenged in courts and not final. Looks like they will challenge so game not over yet.

Nah. It's game over. He has to prove the Minister could not be satisfied that there are grounds for his removal on health and good order grounds. Not that there are no grounds, but that the Minister subjectively could not be satisfied. It's a really high bar to clear (perhaps even an impossible one).

Lego

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).

ezbee

2659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3105

#2851023 14-Jan-2022 21:05

Maybe he should talk to Kim.com

Handle9

11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851024 14-Jan-2022 21:06

ezbee:

Maybe he should talk to Kim.com

Nah, Australia already knows how to be an American vassal state.

Batman

Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851025 14-Jan-2022 21:07

Kyanar:
rugrat:

So the case that got lost was on “procedural fairness grounds”

This time the reason is “health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.”

Also says “as his lawyers prepare to file an immediate injunction against the decision.” so the Ministers decision can be challenged in courts and not final. Looks like they will challenge so game not over yet.

Nah. It's game over. He has to prove the Minister could not be satisfied that there are grounds for his removal on health and good order grounds. Not that there are no grounds, but that the Minister subjectively could not be satisfied. It's a really high bar to clear (perhaps even an impossible one).

Depends on his lawyers, the judge, and the govt lawyers.

All eyes should be on the match clock. Whether it ticks on or postpone until his day on court.

Handle9

11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851027 14-Jan-2022 21:10

Kyanar:

rugrat:

So the case that got lost was on “procedural fairness grounds”

This time the reason is “health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.”

Also says “as his lawyers prepare to file an immediate injunction against the decision.” so the Ministers decision can be challenged in courts and not final. Looks like they will challenge so game not over yet.

Nah. It's game over. He has to prove the Minister could not be satisfied that there are grounds for his removal on health and good order grounds. Not that there are no grounds, but that the Minister subjectively could not be satisfied. It's a really high bar to clear (perhaps even an impossible one).

Yip. The section of the immigration act used specifically excludes natural justice so it doesn't have to be fair, there just need to be grounds.

The previous case was lost on procedural grounds and should never have gotten that far, which is likely why the judge was pretty grouchy about the whole mess.

Handle9

11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851028 14-Jan-2022 21:15

Batman:
Kyanar:

Nah. It's game over. He has to prove the Minister could not be satisfied that there are grounds for his removal on health and good order grounds. Not that there are no grounds, but that the Minister subjectively could not be satisfied. It's a really high bar to clear (perhaps even an impossible one).

Depends on his lawyers, the judge, and the govt lawyers.

All eyes should be on the match clock. Whether it ticks on or postpone until his day on court.

You need to stop watching so many courtroom movies. If the government has correctly followed process then it's done.

Lenovo

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

Batman

Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851031 14-Jan-2022 21:22

Apparently a judge will decide on Saturday whether he will be allowed to compete in the tennis.

Reanalyse

398 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 311

#2851033 14-Jan-2022 21:31

Batman: Apparently a judge will decide on Saturday whether he will be allowed to compete in the tennis.

True but still 'rules for some and not for others'.

From Stuff " Sources earlier in the week confirmed there was a justice on standby to hear the case."

I wonder how many other "non famous" people in visa revoked situations have judges on standby for them.

But I suppose that, if by some way he wins again, he is not impacted in game preparation.

Handle9

11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851034 14-Jan-2022 21:32

Batman: Apparently a judge will decide on Saturday whether he will be allowed to compete in the tennis.

According to whom? He's been asked to go to an immigration interview on Saturday, there are no reports of any case being filed.

Handle9

11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2851042 14-Jan-2022 22:49

Handle9:

Batman: Apparently a judge will decide on Saturday whether he will be allowed to compete in the tennis.

According to whom? He's been asked to go to an immigration interview on Saturday, there are no reports of any case being filed.

There will be a directions hearing tonight. This will give guidance as to the next steps.

1 | ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 23