Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
Scott3
4177 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2990

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3136738 29-Sep-2023 23:54
Send private message

If we were to go the dedicated plane route, these would likely be a good fit for NZ:

I think they are about USD2.3m each. About 3000L capacity (but that payload is shared with fuel), and ability to refill on any appropriate waterway:




Goosey

3016 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 871

Subscriber

  #3136759 30-Sep-2023 10:04
Send private message

That’s Dusty Crop Hopper !


tweake
2647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1138


  #3136818 30-Sep-2023 10:53
Send private message

Scott3:

 

In general wildfires seem to be increasing in frequency, so it would make sense for NZ to scale up it's capability.

My understanding is that rural fire has long been the poor cousin to their urban counterparts when it comes to equipment, (not that the urban centers don't have issues with stuff like old / unreliable ladder units). So expensive aerial firefighting planes are going to be challenging to fund.

That said, I understand a bunch of flash new 4x4 rural fire trucks have been delivered over the last few years. (at about NZ$340k each)


 

One of the below planes (5,300L capacity), runs at about USD30m (about NZD50m). 

How the $30 Million 'Super Scooper' Plane Was Built to Fight Wildfires

Even for a single plane, that is a pretty massive opportunity cost. Could buy over 1500 modern 4x4 rural fire pump /tank trucks. like the below:

The Fire and Emergency New Zealand rural pump truck before it crashed. Photo / Fire and Emergency NZ

 

Or we could look at some of the super flash gear aussie has got in the last while:

Unimog:


Ultra Light (G Class):

 

 

 

 

agreed.

 

what people keep forgetting is planes are not there to put fires out. the firefighting is done by ground crews. so 1500 firetrucks is a huge jump in ability than one plane.




Scott3
4177 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2990

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3137157 30-Sep-2023 20:37
Send private message

Thought about this a little more. There has to be something wrong with the value of the fire fighting planes I quoted above.

The $30m plane costs more than 10x that of the air tractor, but doesn't even carry double the retardant....


tripper1000
1648 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1176


  #3137678 2-Oct-2023 11:52
Send private message

N.Z. bush fires are far less lethal and destroy less property than USA and Australian fires so bush fire fighting isn't any kind of priority here. If dozens of lives were lost every fire, public priorities would  change. 

 

The retardant dropped is corrosive and gets all over the aircraft, so this is why you typically see old retired military/civil aircraft converted to fire bombers (ie low value & disposable). USA fire-bombing companies are in fact interested in our retiring C-130 because they have been maintained better that most. Particularly, the wings have been upgraded, unlike that fatal US firebombing C-130 that had the centre wing failure. 

 

(Pseudo?) Environmentalism has obstructed back-burning and firebreak maintenance in the western world, which is the main reason bush fires are gotten worse in CA and Aussie. (The return of controlled burn-offs was a big thing in NSW this year, but it took a bunch of preventable deaths and destruction for it to be bought back). The retardants dropped by aircraft are not "natural" products, and have big long scary chemical names, so would be vilified by the average kiwi anti-industrialist. Best stick to Di-Hydrogen mono-oxide dropped from helicopters. 

 

 


Wombat1
586 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 409
Inactive user


  #3137684 2-Oct-2023 12:06
Send private message

New Zealand needs fire fighting planes just as much as australia needs an earthquake response system.

 
 
 
 

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).
eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6203

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3137689 2-Oct-2023 12:24
Send private message

Wombat1: New Zealand needs fire fighting planes just as much as australia needs an earthquake response system.

 

Ah - but I was lying awake in bed at 1am in Sydney 40 years ago and felt an earthquake that was later widely reported. 





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


tripper1000
1648 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1176


  #3137824 2-Oct-2023 14:31
Send private message

eracode:

 

Wombat1: New Zealand needs fire fighting planes just as much as Australia needs an earthquake response system.

 

Ah - but I was lying awake in bed at 1am in Sydney 40 years ago and felt an earthquake that was later widely reported. 

 

 

How did you survive without an earthquake response system?


frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #3137864 2-Oct-2023 16:36
Send private message

Scott3:

 

Thought about this a little more. There has to be something wrong with the value of the fire fighting planes I quoted above.

The $30m plane costs more than 10x that of the air tractor, but doesn't even carry double the retardant....

 

 

You pay a large premium for a flying boat. It has to have a whole lot of stuff and structure that an ordinary plane doesn't (starting with an anchor, I guess). I don't think there's much benefit for a flying boat fire-fighting aircraft in NZ... unlike (say) Canada, there's not many lakes and alight-able rivers where there isn't also an airstrip of some kind nearby with road access.

 

[Edit] Just read above about the corrosive nature of retardent. In that aspect flying boats are better, because they're already well-protected against corrosion.

 

 


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.